Flossdog
Member
What's best for a non greased stern gland? If one is far better than the other why are two types available?
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys.
I've had very good results with Ptfe from ASAP. Though the was in a greased stuffing box. Except it wasn't really, never rememberedWhat's best for a non greased stern gland? If one is far better than the other why are two types available?
Thanks guys.
I had graphite packing in my water cooled (non grease) stuffing box from new and changed it to PTFE stuffing after 10 years. Was in the Med at the time, had huge problems just 2 months after changing to PTFE. It got hot and found it impossible to adjust, either dripped too much or got mad hot with only minute changes of the gland adjustment, it even leaked melted PTFE blobs out.
I changed it again after 3 months and used "greasy hemp" stuffing material. Worked perfect from installation, didn't even have to re adjust anymore and is still perfect 300 eng hours later.
I believe the only PTFE you may get now is old stock, many stuffing box seal suppliers have taken PTFE off the market. I suppose if you have a greased stuffing box you may get away with PTFE, but given the choice I would go for graphite or greasy hemp, (if you can get it).
What's best for a non greased stern gland? If one is far better than the other why are two types available?
Thanks guys.
Alpha22, is yours greased?
Floss dog I think the reason why there are different types of stuffing box materials is that the stuffing box was not initially designed for marine prop shaft applications. It has been widely used in the chemical industry for packing and sealing shaft seals on various sizes of valves for ages. In that application the shaft speed is very slow and not continuous as in marine use. The types of packing originally came form that industrial application as did the application, before it was used extensively on boat prop shafts. Hence different material seals became available for various industrial applications in fluids, pressures and materials.
What sort of shaft revs do you think? After the success of the last Ptfe stuffing I was going for the same, but a few alarm bells ringing now. My shaft revs will be about 1400rpm max.Yup! They appeared to be OK at slow speeds, but got astonishingly hot when opened up a little.
What sort of shaft revs do you think? After the success of the last Ptfe stuffing I was going for the same, but a few alarm bells ringing now. My shaft revs will be about 1400rpm max.
Ta
Ah, yes, that makes sense. ThanksIt's not just shaft revs. The revs and the shaft diameter determines the peripheral speed. At one time I was involved with large turbine pumps, which rotated at 1500rpm, and the shafts were about 100mm. Originally we used graphite packing, and at some stage changed to a Teflon based packing. It didn't seem to make any appreciable difference.
What's going on?? Seems to be a common experience so somethings up, yet I had years of drip free cool motoring, using ASAP stuffing. Could there be differences in different types?are there different types?An interesting thread. I recently repacked the stern gland on Cecilia, using PTFE. The shaft diameter is about 30 mm and rotational speed I guess is pretty low. The previous packing was in very poor condition, leaking badly. Since repacking the shaft rotates very freely, the yoke bolts are as loose as they can be without falling off, but the gland overheats badly within a few minutes of motoring. Greasing seems to improve it briefly but overheating then recurs. No idea of the reason as yet.