Gland packing Graphite or PTFE?

GHA

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
12,430
Location
Hopefully somewhere warm
Visit site
What's best for a non greased stern gland? If one is far better than the other why are two types available?
Thanks guys.
I've had very good results with Ptfe from ASAP. Though the was in a greased stuffing box. Except it wasn't really, never remembered :)
Interestingly, I just ordered a new stuffing box from tnorris who mentioned they use graphite now after a few customers mentioned the Ptfe was causing more heating. Not heard that before and my last one ran virtually drip free and cool.
 

ksutton

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2005
Messages
908
Visit site
I had graphite packing in my water cooled (non grease) stuffing box from new and changed it to PTFE stuffing after 10 years. Was in the Med at the time, had huge problems just 2 months after changing to PTFE. It got hot and found it impossible to adjust, either dripped too much or got mad hot with only minute changes of the gland adjustment, it even leaked melted PTFE blobs out.
I changed it again after 3 months and used "greasy hemp" stuffing material. Worked perfect from installation, didn't even have to re adjust anymore and is still perfect 300 eng hours later.
I believe the only PTFE you may get now is old stock, many stuffing box seal suppliers have taken PTFE off the market. I suppose if you have a greased stuffing box you may get away with PTFE, but given the choice I would go for graphite or greasy hemp, (if you can get it).
 

Mel

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2001
Messages
190
Location
Live in South Norfolk
Visit site
I think the PTFE one would last longer as the properties of the PTFE are able to deal with high temperatures.
Both have been in use in industry a long time. I recall PTFE coming onto the market in the 1960's and the material survived difficult applications where abrasives were present in the water being pumped.
 

Alpha22

Active member
Joined
22 Sep 2003
Messages
1,413
Location
Cambridgeshire
Visit site
Just done both of mine with PTFE, now running too hot to touch!!! Will have to haul out and replace... annoying as they are both very inaccessible.
 

GHA

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
12,430
Location
Hopefully somewhere warm
Visit site
I had graphite packing in my water cooled (non grease) stuffing box from new and changed it to PTFE stuffing after 10 years. Was in the Med at the time, had huge problems just 2 months after changing to PTFE. It got hot and found it impossible to adjust, either dripped too much or got mad hot with only minute changes of the gland adjustment, it even leaked melted PTFE blobs out.
I changed it again after 3 months and used "greasy hemp" stuffing material. Worked perfect from installation, didn't even have to re adjust anymore and is still perfect 300 eng hours later.
I believe the only PTFE you may get now is old stock, many stuffing box seal suppliers have taken PTFE off the market. I suppose if you have a greased stuffing box you may get away with PTFE, but given the choice I would go for graphite or greasy hemp, (if you can get it).

Maybe the grease is a factor after all..

Flax PTFE gland packing must be regularly lubricated with quality water resistant grease, such as Drive Force 807680 and 807684.
http://www.asap-supplies.com/marine/ptfe-flax-gland-packing

Alpha22, is yours greased?
 

ksutton

Member
Joined
29 Jul 2005
Messages
908
Visit site
What's best for a non greased stern gland? If one is far better than the other why are two types available?
Thanks guys.

Floss dog I think the reason why there are different types of stuffing box materials is that the stuffing box was not initially designed for marine prop shaft applications. It has been widely used in the chemical industry for packing and sealing shaft seals on various sizes of valves for ages. In that application the shaft speed is very slow and not continuous as in marine use. The types of packing originally came form that industrial application as did the application, before it was used extensively on boat prop shafts. Hence different material seals became available for various industrial applications in fluids, pressures and materials.
 

Poignard

Well-known member
Joined
23 Jul 2005
Messages
52,959
Location
South London
Visit site
I last repacked mine several years ago, and I used ptfe instead of hemp. The gland ran quite hot, too hot to leave your hand on it for long.

I thought this was due to me putting too much grease in and so preventing any cooling water getting near the bearing. I cut down drastically on the greasing and the bearing ran cooler but it's still hotter than I think it should be.

Maybe the ptfe packing is the culprit, as suggested above.
 

NormanS

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2008
Messages
9,710
Visit site
Floss dog I think the reason why there are different types of stuffing box materials is that the stuffing box was not initially designed for marine prop shaft applications. It has been widely used in the chemical industry for packing and sealing shaft seals on various sizes of valves for ages. In that application the shaft speed is very slow and not continuous as in marine use. The types of packing originally came form that industrial application as did the application, before it was used extensively on boat prop shafts. Hence different material seals became available for various industrial applications in fluids, pressures and materials.

Packing glands have been, and still are used in all sorts of pumps etc, some with shaft peripheral speeds well in excess of small boat prop shafts.
 

NormanS

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2008
Messages
9,710
Visit site
What sort of shaft revs do you think? After the success of the last Ptfe stuffing I was going for the same, but a few alarm bells ringing now. My shaft revs will be about 1400rpm max.

Ta

It's not just shaft revs. The revs and the shaft diameter determines the peripheral speed. At one time I was involved with large turbine pumps, which rotated at 1500rpm, and the shafts were about 100mm. Originally we used graphite packing, and at some stage changed to a Teflon based packing. It didn't seem to make any appreciable difference.
 

charles_reed

Active member
Joined
29 Jun 2001
Messages
10,413
Location
Home Shropshire 6/12; boat Greece 6/12
Visit site
I thought I knew a little about gland-packing materials and, on reading this thread became increasingly confused (as the posters appear to be).
As with many things in the life we look for sound-bite answers, which are as likely to farther confuse than to elucidate. Hence, I suspect, many revert to the ultimate low-tech answer - greasy string.
I will confess that I have no answer for the OP - his question offers inadequate information and appears to be based upon a simplistic perception of a fairly hi-tech branch of industry;-

http://www.sealrite.co.uk/gland_packing.htm?gclid=CM3swPOTj70CFSUUwwod8GoArA
 

GHA

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
12,430
Location
Hopefully somewhere warm
Visit site
It's not just shaft revs. The revs and the shaft diameter determines the peripheral speed. At one time I was involved with large turbine pumps, which rotated at 1500rpm, and the shafts were about 100mm. Originally we used graphite packing, and at some stage changed to a Teflon based packing. It didn't seem to make any appreciable difference.
Ah, yes, that makes sense. Thanks

25mm prop so 1400/60*0.025=5.83 m/s

Anyone who's had hot Ptfe stuffing care to shaft revs & dia ?

Ta
 

savageseadog

Well-known member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
23,296
Visit site
I've never used gland packing nor am I an expert but when I was selling some at a boat jumble I was told that PTFE packing can score shafts.
 

vyv_cox

Well-known member
Joined
16 May 2001
Messages
25,861
Location
France, sailing Aegean Sea.
coxeng.co.uk
An interesting thread. I recently repacked the stern gland on Cecilia, using PTFE. The shaft diameter is about 30 mm and rotational speed I guess is pretty low. The previous packing was in very poor condition, leaking badly. Since repacking the shaft rotates very freely, the yoke bolts are as loose as they can be without falling off, but the gland overheats badly within a few minutes of motoring. Greasing seems to improve it briefly but overheating then recurs. No idea of the reason as yet.
 

KellysEye

Active member
Joined
23 Jul 2006
Messages
12,695
Location
Emsworth Hants
www.kellyseye.net
I have used PTFE tape to seal compression fittings for Copper water pipes, as far as I know it is not made for rotating shafts so it no wonder it gets hot and breaks up. Our boat had two greasers, for the front and back shaft bearings, and I used waxed flax in the stuffing box. Without greasers waxed flax should work but I would expect it will have to to be replaced regularly. I have no experience with graphite.
 

DerrickHigton

Member
Joined
13 Apr 2003
Messages
42
Location
Petersfield Hampshire
Visit site
Another factor is that you need to be aware that you can have electrolytic corrosion using graphite packing with stainless steel shafts. Crevice corrosion is a potential problem with any packing, due to the exclusion of oxygen, even with a nickel aluminium bronze (NAB) shaft, as in my case. There are some relatively exotic packings available that are worth considering, many combining PTFE and graphite!


After considerable research I decided to use Gore GFO packing. Although clearly the answer to the maidens prayer, I still had some concerns about the risk of electrolytic corrosion between the noble carbon and the less noble nickel aluminium bronze (NAB) shaft (not approved by the American Bureau of Shipping for this reason). I contacted the W L Gore Associates UK office and they assured me that it would not be a problem.

The carbon is actually impregnated in the PTFE; running fingers over it leaves no residue.

Not a drip since!
 

GHA

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
12,430
Location
Hopefully somewhere warm
Visit site
An interesting thread. I recently repacked the stern gland on Cecilia, using PTFE. The shaft diameter is about 30 mm and rotational speed I guess is pretty low. The previous packing was in very poor condition, leaking badly. Since repacking the shaft rotates very freely, the yoke bolts are as loose as they can be without falling off, but the gland overheats badly within a few minutes of motoring. Greasing seems to improve it briefly but overheating then recurs. No idea of the reason as yet.
What's going on?? Seems to be a common experience so somethings up, yet I had years of drip free cool motoring, using ASAP stuffing. Could there be differences in different types?are there different types?

This was the stuff I used.. http://www.asap-supplies.com/marine/ptfe-flax-gland-packing
[h=1]PTFE Flax Gland Packing[/h]Drive Force PTFE flax gland packing rope is ideal for packing out shaft bearings and glands.
PTFE impregnated flax 'Sturntite' packing is ideal for boat prop shaft applications, as the PTFE makes it 'super slippery' while the flax material reduces wear on the shaft when compared to graphite cotton or asbestos rope type gland packing.
We sell PTFE flax gland packing either on an 8 metre roll, or per metre for maintenance. Most glands or bearings require three rings of gland packing, so a one metre length is enough to provide three rings for shafts up to 100mm (4”) in diameter.
Flax PTFE gland packing must be regularly lubricated with quality water resistant grease, such as Drive Force 807680 and 807684.
 

Alpha22

Active member
Joined
22 Sep 2003
Messages
1,413
Location
Cambridgeshire
Visit site
My shafts are an inch and a quarter... quite chunky and at fast cruising speed are rotating in the order of 2000 to 2500 rpm.
Looks like an order from ASAP is on the cards.
 
Top