ANDY_W
Active member
I am putting this before the honorable members of this forum as a reality check.
For the last 18 years, my two ring gas stove has been one of those with a Camping
Gaz bottle screwed directly under the stove.
The whole thing is mounted firmly, not gimballed, in an open topped box in the galley area.
The bottle rests on the bottom of the box and the stove is secured with latches to the box.
A gas alarm sensor is fitted at the bottom of the box.
In an emergency, the box can be dismounted, without disturbing the stove, and thrown over the side.
Anytime I mention this arrangement, especially to surveyors, I am greeted with expressions of horror, as if the whole thing was the work of the devil, and I am left with the impression that they honestly believe that I am playing with fire.
The attraction of such a system to me is that it is very simple and uncomplicated. There is only one seal ( stove to cylinder ). Provided I ensure that the seal is in good condition ( I inspect it every time I change the bottle ) no other maintenance is required.
Compare this with the requirements for a modern gas system:
6 or 7 joints minimum from bottle to stove
Gas pipe passing through bulkheads and locker sides
Flexible connection from tap to stove.
Gas tight locker sealed from the rest of the boat and draining over the side.
Each joint and every point at which the pipe passes through a bulkhead is a potential failure point, requiring frequent inspection for safety, even if, as is often the case, the system is wholly or partially buried behind interior fittings.
I wonder how many people religiously inspect their entire gas system every month or so, as I do when I change bottles.
I also wonder how many gas explosions on boats have been due to un-noticed failure
of systems installed to modern requirements. That on Lord Trenchard, a training ship, springs to mind.
Am I a lucky so and so to have survived so long, or is my approach valid?
I would really appreciate your views just in case I need to re-think.
Andy
For the last 18 years, my two ring gas stove has been one of those with a Camping
Gaz bottle screwed directly under the stove.
The whole thing is mounted firmly, not gimballed, in an open topped box in the galley area.
The bottle rests on the bottom of the box and the stove is secured with latches to the box.
A gas alarm sensor is fitted at the bottom of the box.
In an emergency, the box can be dismounted, without disturbing the stove, and thrown over the side.
Anytime I mention this arrangement, especially to surveyors, I am greeted with expressions of horror, as if the whole thing was the work of the devil, and I am left with the impression that they honestly believe that I am playing with fire.
The attraction of such a system to me is that it is very simple and uncomplicated. There is only one seal ( stove to cylinder ). Provided I ensure that the seal is in good condition ( I inspect it every time I change the bottle ) no other maintenance is required.
Compare this with the requirements for a modern gas system:
6 or 7 joints minimum from bottle to stove
Gas pipe passing through bulkheads and locker sides
Flexible connection from tap to stove.
Gas tight locker sealed from the rest of the boat and draining over the side.
Each joint and every point at which the pipe passes through a bulkhead is a potential failure point, requiring frequent inspection for safety, even if, as is often the case, the system is wholly or partially buried behind interior fittings.
I wonder how many people religiously inspect their entire gas system every month or so, as I do when I change bottles.
I also wonder how many gas explosions on boats have been due to un-noticed failure
of systems installed to modern requirements. That on Lord Trenchard, a training ship, springs to mind.
Am I a lucky so and so to have survived so long, or is my approach valid?
I would really appreciate your views just in case I need to re-think.
Andy