Neeves
Well-Known Member
Every thread on issues with an exhaust elbow and specifically the MD20 series (but I also believe the newer D1 series) mentions the difficulties of removal and the blocking of the elbow with a deposit, erroneously described as carbon but actually calcium hydroxide or carbonate pigmented with carbon.
The deposit can be removed with acid (proving that it is not carbon) but the acid also attacks the steel or the casting and I have found you can only acid treat once (and it is very messy)
If the elbow did not block there would be no need to remove it - and then the whole issues would go away. Not entirely true as the cast versions do corrode - but they block more frequently than corrode - so corrosion is not a big issue.
Along with the above the other oft repeated comment is to replace the elbow with a stainless version, or which there are a number of entrepeneurs out there making them. A google search also throws up pictures of what look like cast stainless version - identical to the cast iron or steel versions - looking very professional.
Despite the constant mention of replacing with a stainless version I have never seen a back up report suggesting they offer any solutions to the issues of the genuine cast version. The water intake (spigot) on the cast version seems to have a baffle inside, to spread the water? - and this baffle, or its method of attachment does corrode (and many stainless items corrode where there is any welding).
I've just removed my exhaust elbow (another interesting story) but I need to replace the elbow and am wondering whether to go down the stainless route or stick with the original cast version.
Do stainless elbows last longer? do they somehow stop the calcium build up,? are they corrosion free? - basically are they worth the money.
Any background
Jonathan
I have read, on this forum, that part of the problem is caused by running the engine under low load, say to recharge batteries.
If the deposition is, as I elude, a calcium deposit then the mechanism is a chemical process within the elbow - the calcium comes from seawater (and it maybe a calcium and magnesium deposit). It is difficult to envisage why stainless would reduce this deposition, unless something in the cast iron acts as a catalyst. But if it is a thermo-chemical process then running the engine, not under load, should not make any difference......? Calcium deposition also occurs on the water intake hoses - which you can clear by beating the hoses on a hard surface and then flushing them clean. Calcium and magnesium in seawater is common and in some parts of the world the water is saturated and there is a natural deposition (which would eventually form limestone or dolomite). There are facilities round the world extracting magnesium from seawater or brine - its common place (think Hartlepool between 1940 and 2000 - ish where 100,000s of tons were extracted). Think also of furring of your kettle (in the absence of a water softener).
The deposit can be removed with acid (proving that it is not carbon) but the acid also attacks the steel or the casting and I have found you can only acid treat once (and it is very messy)
If the elbow did not block there would be no need to remove it - and then the whole issues would go away. Not entirely true as the cast versions do corrode - but they block more frequently than corrode - so corrosion is not a big issue.
Along with the above the other oft repeated comment is to replace the elbow with a stainless version, or which there are a number of entrepeneurs out there making them. A google search also throws up pictures of what look like cast stainless version - identical to the cast iron or steel versions - looking very professional.
Despite the constant mention of replacing with a stainless version I have never seen a back up report suggesting they offer any solutions to the issues of the genuine cast version. The water intake (spigot) on the cast version seems to have a baffle inside, to spread the water? - and this baffle, or its method of attachment does corrode (and many stainless items corrode where there is any welding).
I've just removed my exhaust elbow (another interesting story) but I need to replace the elbow and am wondering whether to go down the stainless route or stick with the original cast version.
Do stainless elbows last longer? do they somehow stop the calcium build up,? are they corrosion free? - basically are they worth the money.
Any background
Jonathan
I have read, on this forum, that part of the problem is caused by running the engine under low load, say to recharge batteries.
If the deposition is, as I elude, a calcium deposit then the mechanism is a chemical process within the elbow - the calcium comes from seawater (and it maybe a calcium and magnesium deposit). It is difficult to envisage why stainless would reduce this deposition, unless something in the cast iron acts as a catalyst. But if it is a thermo-chemical process then running the engine, not under load, should not make any difference......? Calcium deposition also occurs on the water intake hoses - which you can clear by beating the hoses on a hard surface and then flushing them clean. Calcium and magnesium in seawater is common and in some parts of the world the water is saturated and there is a natural deposition (which would eventually form limestone or dolomite). There are facilities round the world extracting magnesium from seawater or brine - its common place (think Hartlepool between 1940 and 2000 - ish where 100,000s of tons were extracted). Think also of furring of your kettle (in the absence of a water softener).
Last edited: