Chiara’s slave
Well-known member
We always sail through other cruising boats’ lee. It’s just good manners.
I'm sure that has long been an assumption, especially sailing to windward. But IIRC Tom Cunliffe (who he?) opined in YM a few years ago that he favoured overtaking to windward and getting out of the way ASAP. There might have been some controversy...We always sail through other cruising boats’ lee. It’s just good manners.
We’ve usually got a decent speed differential anyway, so zipping through to lee is the right thing for us. We’re not going to hang around there like a bad smell.I'm sure that has long been an assumption, especially sailing to windward. But IIRC Tom Cunliffe (who he?) opined in YM a few years ago that he favoured overtaking to windward and getting out of the way ASAP. There might have been some controversy...
I noted that too. There have been occasions when I have put it to the test, and so far managed without being shot at, but in most cases it was when there was a large speed differential and only a short time of overlap. On the other hand, it really makes sense that a boat that would struggle to get through the other boat’s lee should be expected to pass to windward and get the business of overtaking over as quickly as possible, if only because there is always a risk of conflict or collision.I'm sure that has long been an assumption, especially sailing to windward. But IIRC Tom Cunliffe (who he?) opined in YM a few years ago that he favoured overtaking to windward and getting out of the way ASAP. There might have been some controversy...
Get on vhf and talk to each other. No?Over the weekend we were on a downwind leg sailing about 160 apparent …I actually wanted to do about 170 to get to my target, which was a marina, but the Genoa kept collapsing and I didn’t want to goosewing at the point
wind was around 8-10 knots apparent, so we were moving along ok
another, slightly longer boat exited the departure point (out of a lock) at the same time, and initially took quite a different line.
it became clear that he was also heading to the same location, and having been both upwind and down wind of us and sailing a different line, he eventually settled on a line that was parallel to us, following a course that would be about 30 m apart when he came alongside, but upwind of us. He gradually gained on us to the point that he was casting a wind shadow that caused our Genoa to keep collapsing.
we were sailing on autopilot, so I clicked round a few degree to windward just to fill the Genoa again. He continued to gain on us slowly and again his wind shadow started impacting us so I clicked up a few degrees again
this continued for another 5 minutes
I wasn’t trying to stop him overtaking if that was what he wanted to do, we were never in a trending towards collision situation, ..I just wanted to keep the boat moving and didn’t see why I had to let him kill me ..
in the end he bore right away, gybed and went behind me, off to 200 -300 metres down wind, where he proceeded to gybe again and set himself on a converging course. Cos he was going maybe .3 knot faster he was ahead of us when our tracks merged 30 minutes later. He did not look amused and seemedlike he might have thought I was luffing him deliberately to stop him overtaking, rather than making small course alteration just to keep my sails filled.
I get it that if we were racing, I could have luffed him and I would normally have tried to stay ahead of him, and he would have been trying to get ahead of us.
I believe I understand the COLREGS
and I know I could have gybed away as he started to blanket me.
my question is about the etiquette involved, as it’s nit something I’ve really experienced or thought about before. if we had been on a reach or a fetch I would have been able to trim the sails to manage the turbulence, but the course angle didn’t seem to give me any option other than head up a few degrees.
- would it have been good etiquette/generally accepted practice for him to give us more room before he tried to overtake us, to leave us our wind ?
- would it have been good etiquette for me to have accepted being blanketed and waited for the few minutes it would take him to get past t the speed differential he had with my sails flapping ?
Get on vhf and talk to each other. No?
One or both have probably got the VHF turned off-----We have a whole thread bickering about that!Get on vhf and talk to each other. No?
Not sure why @Capt Popeye dislikes my comment.
The MCA have been quite clear on their strong feelings on the matter of VHF for deconfliction services.
I may, for example, draw their attention to MGN 324.
I'll admit that I've never given any thought to which side I pass another boat, I just give them as much space as possible and get gone.
Sorry everyone.
May I suggest, Captain, with all due humility, that "probable" is a word best avoided in anything to do with collision avoidanceMaybe its a case of monitoring all others around you in you collective Water Space , then maybe steering a 'dog leg' course that avoids them others steering a more direct course to a probable destination ?