Ooh 'eck …. don't need one that much! I've got a couple of small cameras which are waterproof so might just lash one of them to a boathook and try that! The memsahib's little camera only cost about 60 quid so if it makes a bid for freedom it won't hurt too much!So what if we could combine Kingfisher and BruceK’s idea and get one of these
https://www.pce-instruments.com/eng...-telescoping-pole-pce-ive-320-det_2202026.htm
A bit pricey but maybe someone could research for a cheaper alternative
I'll try it … Haven't got a Go-Pro - the cheap camera is only a £60 Kodak supposedly OK to 10 metres as I remember and it must give better pics in clear water than an endoscope! My other 'waterproof' camera is a quite expensive Sony which I don't think I'll take a chance on! Getting it under the platform at the right angle might need some experimentation though.I think if you are serious about this a water proof Go Pro or one in a waterproof casing is probably the best option for hull inspection. At least then you can get a realistic picture of just how much growth there is over a decent sized area.
So are endoscopesGo Pros are surely far too big to fit in 0.3cm gaps .
Tried but without success. Bought one on ebay which said it focussed fro 5cm to infinity but it didn't. Over 10cm no clear picture so in murky water it was impossible to find the prop with the camera on a long cranked stick. Hopefully someone can post a link to one that actually works.Has anyone used one of these to check on props, tabs, weed etc?
..... View attachment 75145Any good?
So are endoscopes
Has anyone tried a wetsuit![]()
I think if you tried it again in a bay, not the conwy river which runs at over 5 knots it maybe better ? :highly_amused:I used it once but the water was so murky unless you were right up close you couldn't see anything.