franksingleton
Well-Known Member
Like the UK Met Office, ECMWF has always charged for its GRIB data. PredictWind did some form of deal, I have no idea about details, and now provides both ECMWF and UK GRIB data products to its paying customers. As a loss leader, I understand that they make limited amounts of data freely available. Some while ago, I cannot give the date, Windy,com began providing ECMWF GRIB information on their app. As they also have a commercial service, I guess that they also pay ECMWF and that the rest of us freeloaders benefit.
Yesterday, I noticed that Ventusky.com also had ECMWF GRIBs on their browser version but not (yet?) on their app. Then, when using the WeatherTrack app, I saw that they, too, had ECMWF data as one of their many options.
Experimenting with the app, I saw that they provide the data only on a 0.4 degree resolution, not on the full 0.1 degree as PredictWind say that they do. As there is smoothing in all NWP models, the effective resolution of any model is around 5 grid lengths. Consequently, there should be no loss of real information using WeatherTrack as opposed to paying PW, at least for a limited range of elements, wind, pressure, temperature. I surmise that both Windy and Ventusky are also using the 0.4 degree data in their apps. While these are two good presentations, I always wonder and have never checked the download costs of either. The advantage of WeatherTrack is that you can control download size , useful when roaming and more so over a satphone data connection.
I have to wonder when the Met Office will also be providing its GRIB data as freely as other Met services. A letter that I wrote to the Royal Met Society has brought no apparent change oh heart yet.
Does anyone have any more information on these issues? Any corrections or additional information?
Yesterday, I noticed that Ventusky.com also had ECMWF GRIBs on their browser version but not (yet?) on their app. Then, when using the WeatherTrack app, I saw that they, too, had ECMWF data as one of their many options.
Experimenting with the app, I saw that they provide the data only on a 0.4 degree resolution, not on the full 0.1 degree as PredictWind say that they do. As there is smoothing in all NWP models, the effective resolution of any model is around 5 grid lengths. Consequently, there should be no loss of real information using WeatherTrack as opposed to paying PW, at least for a limited range of elements, wind, pressure, temperature. I surmise that both Windy and Ventusky are also using the 0.4 degree data in their apps. While these are two good presentations, I always wonder and have never checked the download costs of either. The advantage of WeatherTrack is that you can control download size , useful when roaming and more so over a satphone data connection.
I have to wonder when the Met Office will also be providing its GRIB data as freely as other Met services. A letter that I wrote to the Royal Met Society has brought no apparent change oh heart yet.
Does anyone have any more information on these issues? Any corrections or additional information?
Last edited:
