jdc
Well-known member
Heat will do fine instead of a dehumidifier since warm air with exactly the same amount of water (ie measured grammes per cubic metre) will have much lowered RH.
This graph shows the effect:
So if the ambient air is at 10 °C and 90% RH - which is about typical for winter here in Cornwall - and you heat you house or boat to 18 °C, the RH inside will be around 52%, which is a very comfortable and probably ideal value. So with heating, be it electric, fires, wood burners, central heating or whatever don't need the dehumidifier. Conversely I could heat my boat and not bother with the dehumidifier, but actually that's much less energy efficient when I'm not living aboard.
It also shows the absurdity of the assertion that 'low humidity will shrink wood': putting the heater on for a while (so RH falls from 90% to 50%) will inevitably crack all the panelling will it?
This graph shows the effect:
![fig_3_hygrometric_chart.jpg](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fmanual.museum.wa.gov.au%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Ffig_3_hygrometric_chart.jpg&hash=94ac0b1608060008825fd65e8d3d0c76)
So if the ambient air is at 10 °C and 90% RH - which is about typical for winter here in Cornwall - and you heat you house or boat to 18 °C, the RH inside will be around 52%, which is a very comfortable and probably ideal value. So with heating, be it electric, fires, wood burners, central heating or whatever don't need the dehumidifier. Conversely I could heat my boat and not bother with the dehumidifier, but actually that's much less energy efficient when I'm not living aboard.
It also shows the absurdity of the assertion that 'low humidity will shrink wood': putting the heater on for a while (so RH falls from 90% to 50%) will inevitably crack all the panelling will it?