Cruising Yacht performance advantage

AngusMcDoon

Well-known member
Joined
20 Oct 2004
Messages
8,832
Location
Up some Hebridean loch
Visit site
I believe that was intended to reduce the risk of pitchpoling.

It's to reduce hobby-horsing, not pitchpoling. Cruising cats don't pitchpole that often. Prout started the idea, and Broadblues continue with it - aft set mast above the companionway bulkhead and twin headsails. A great rig plan for trade wind sailing, but adds to the cost with the twin headsails.

385_gallery-300x213.jpg
 

geem

Well-known member
Joined
27 Apr 2006
Messages
8,043
Location
Caribbean
Visit site
It's to reduce hobby-horsing, not pitchpoling. Cruising cats don't pitchpole that often. Prout started the idea, and Broadblues continue with it - aft set mast above the companionway bulkhead and twin headsails. A great rig plan for trade wind sailing, but adds to the cost with the twin headsails.

385_gallery-300x213.jpg
We sailed a Prout 37 with an extra tall rig on an Atlantic circuit in 2004/5. It's a great down wind rig as you say. We set an asymmetric spinnaker on a pole or twin headsails on a Twistel rig.
 
Last edited:

Supertramp

Well-known member
Joined
18 Jul 2020
Messages
1,047
Location
Halifax
Visit site
We sailed a Prout 37 with an extra tall rig on an Atlantic circuit in 2004/5. It's a great down wind rig as you say. We set an asymmetric spinnaker on a pole or twin headsails on a Twistel rig.
I should have thought the mast position is about where the designer wants the centre of effort of the sailplan(s) relative to the keel(s). Given that there is more trickery going on underwater on these boats with canting keels, dagger boards and twin rudders I can easily understand that the mast position becomes unusual. I always thought that one reason for keeping the mast aft on an ocean racer was to avoid burying the bow in extreme downwind sailing. It will be interesting to see what useful features trickle down to production boats in due course. I do think multiple forestays are a good thing but I'm less convinced by a square topped mainsail!

The Fjord 28 was an unusual boat but I thought that the mast on it and the early Prouts was positioned to be accessible from the cockpit in the days before we created spaghetti junction with clutches etc.
 

geem

Well-known member
Joined
27 Apr 2006
Messages
8,043
Location
Caribbean
Visit site
I should have thought the mast position is about where the designer wants the centre of effort of the sailplan(s) relative to the keel(s). Given that there is more trickery going on underwater on these boats with canting keels, dagger boards and twin rudders I can easily understand that the mast position becomes unusual. I always thought that one reason for keeping the mast aft on an ocean racer was to avoid burying the bow in extreme downwind sailing. It will be interesting to see what useful features trickle down to production boats in due course. I do think multiple forestays are a good thing but I'm less convinced by a square topped mainsail!

The Fjord 28 was an unusual boat but I thought that the mast on it and the early Prouts was positioned to be accessible from the cockpit in the days before we created spaghetti junction with clutches etc.
I always thought the Prout rig was for easy downwind sailing. There was a point in history when Prout catamarans had done more ocean miles between them than an other multihull. You still seem to find examples of them tucked away in far flung places. A very robust little catamaran
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
14,071
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
The fore and aft location makes no difference in that sense.
Are you sure? Move the centre of wind pressure aft, then there is a longer lever length for the bow to resist being pushed down.
The force vectors would seem to me to support the view that further aft less likely to top forward.
If you have any better science to support your view please explain
 

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,174
Visit site
Are you sure? Move the centre of wind pressure aft, then there is a longer lever length for the bow to resist being pushed down.
The force vectors would seem to me to support the view that further aft less likely to top forward.
If you have any better science to support your view please explain
It's the same as an aircraft with engines on the nose, wing or tail.

It's the rig height that affects the tendency to bury the bow.
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
14,071
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
It's the same as an aircraft with engines on the nose, wing or tail.

It's the rig height that affects the tendency to bury the bow.
Not if you draw the vectors - buoyancy further forward has more leverage.
Try a movement to extreme - move to the very tip of the bow it would fall over forward. Move to the very stern and would be very difficult to tip forward.
 

Concerto

Well-known member
Joined
16 Jul 2014
Messages
6,153
Location
Chatham Maritime Marina
Visit site
The Fjord 28 was an unusual boat but I thought that the mast on it and the early Prouts was positioned to be accessible from the cockpit in the days before we created spaghetti junction with clutches etc.
The Fjord 28 sail plan was not that unusual for that period. Late RORC rating rule and early IOR rating rule encouraged very large headsails and very short booms. The ¼ ton cup winner of 1969 Listang has a similar type rig. SailboatData.com - LISTANG Sailboat By today's standard the rig looks short and the forestay could have been moved even further forward. I remember racing against a Listang and they were fast for their size.
 

anoccasionalyachtsman

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2015
Messages
4,174
Visit site
Not if you draw the vectors - buoyancy further forward has more leverage.
Try a movement to extreme - move to the very tip of the bow it would fall over forward. Move to the very stern and would be very difficult to tip forward.
Yes, a fuller bow will resist immersion more strongly, but that isn't related to mast position.

Have a look at cat-rigged boats with their mast right up in the bow, and not known for pitchpoling.
 

Zing

Well-known member
Joined
7 Feb 2014
Messages
8,078
Visit site
Backstays, in a word.

The boats you are referencing all have square top mains and split topmast backstays. So require the crew to swap the tension from one backstay to the other when tacking or gybing. (Think running backstays, but to the top of the mast)
The advantage of this is that you can then have the boom at, or even overhanging, the transom as it does not have to clear a fixed backstay. The addition of the square top also allows you to keep a similar area for a shorter foot. These 2 things together allow you to set the mast well back in the boat without reducing mainsail size, with the associated advantages of being able to set multiple, massive, headsails.
A lot of performance sailing boats are following this trend, to greater or lesser extents. Even boats with fixed backstays have been inching the mast aft as the advantages of multiple headsails are becoming ever more apparent.
This has in fact happened in cruising boats to, most notably the POGO type. Pogo either have no backstay or offer twin backstays to provide additional security, especially when using masthead kites.

It is also worth mentioning that the biggest gains in these sorts of rigs are seen reaching when coupled with their big bowsprits they are able to set up to 3 headsails simultaneously, when using outriggers or whisker poles set to leeward This isn't really a rig that is especially well suited to a cruising boat, as you have to be quite careful with your trim to ensure that they all work together, rather than disrupt the airflow and slow you down. It's not really a set and forget sailplan. It;s notable for instance that the IMOCAs aren't really going for 3 headsails, but staying with 2. And it also works best on boats which are fast enough to drag the apparent forward significantly. Plus of course you need to be messing about with outriggers, outboard leads for the sheets etc.
And... It's a sailplan that increases in utility as you go up in size and can increase the physical separation between the sails.

So for a more conventional displacement cruiser the disadvantages, namely the hassle of swapping backstays, the added complication of outriggers etc, the necessity of a big fixed bowsprit, plus dealing with squaretop mainsails aren't really compensated by the advantage of useable extra horsepower off the wind.
it sounds like It would fail a sensible cruiser’s risk analysis. A high risk of something going wrong, with particularly bad consequences if they do go wrong. Imagine what a moment of inattention, a consequent crash jibe, would go to the boom, the back stay, the whole rig. It would also fail the test of requiring minimal effort and manpower. All in all, a non-starter for cruising. Foiling yachts, ditto.
 

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
21,248
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
Living, as I do, by the Thames estuary with rivers, sandbanks & tides to contend with I seem to do a lot of tacking. Twin foresails along with twin stays would greatly hinder tacks & be a real pain. Hence my love of the ST jib. I rarely use the genoa. Of course long distance cruisers do not tack very often. But then I expect that the vast majority of boats sold only do day sails, or short coastal trips and do get involved in a greater number of manouvers.
So whilst bigger boats would use more headsails, the smaller end of the cruising market- as opposed to the racing one- would not enjoy twin stays, unless the inner was an optional removeable one.
 

Tranona

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2007
Messages
42,531
Visit site
Living, as I do, by the Thames estuary with rivers, sandbanks & tides to contend with I seem to do a lot of tacking. Twin foresails along with twin stays would greatly hinder tacks & be a real pain. Hence my love of the ST jib. I rarely use the genoa. Of course long distance cruisers do not tack very often. But then I expect that the vast majority of boats sold only do day sails, or short coastal trips and do get involved in a greater number of manouvers.
So whilst bigger boats would use more headsails, the smaller end of the cruising market- as opposed to the racing one- would not enjoy twin stays, unless the inner was an optional removeable one.
That is true for our conditions and why historically boats designed and built in the UK and N Europe were strong on windward performance, it is not so true of the places where people are buying new boats, so offwind performance and outdoor living have higher priority.

Worth looking at the Dufour 32 tested in YM this month to see how some of the design trends being discussed here have found their way down into production boats.
 

geem

Well-known member
Joined
27 Apr 2006
Messages
8,043
Location
Caribbean
Visit site
Living, as I do, by the Thames estuary with rivers, sandbanks & tides to contend with I seem to do a lot of tacking. Twin foresails along with twin stays would greatly hinder tacks & be a real pain. Hence my love of the ST jib. I rarely use the genoa. Of course long distance cruisers do not tack very often. But then I expect that the vast majority of boats sold only do day sails, or short coastal trips and do get involved in a greater number of manouvers.
So whilst bigger boats would use more headsails, the smaller end of the cruising market- as opposed to the racing one- would not enjoy twin stays, unless the inner was an optional removeable one.
I can understand that. Out here in Falmouth Harbour, Antigua, looking around the anchorage at the abundance of 40-60ft boats at anchor, many have adopted a solent rig with twin headsails furlers, us included. This is common to modern boat designs and older ones. Over here strong winds are the norm, although we have just had a few days of light wind, so tacking up the island would be done on the inner jib and reefed main. Not dissimilar to your tacking around the Thames Estuary.
 

Birdseye

Well-known member
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Messages
28,429
Location
s e wales
Visit site
Sat here in Falmouth Harbour Antigua, the racing yachts are beginning to arrive ready for the Caribbean 600 race later this month. We have a VOR70 anchored next to us. A VOR65 the other side and the 100ft maxi Comanche is on the dock. She has the 24hr record for a monohull. These 3 designs are clearly up there as some of the fastest monohulls afloat. They all share some notable design features. They have wide transoms and their masts are very far aft. Clearly these stripped out carbon machines share little with any cruising monohull so why do modern cruising monohulls have their masts so far forward if the best and fastest racing boats have theirs so far back? The Imoca 60s also share this aft mast arrangement and run headsails on furlers but that's where the similarity with a modern cruising boat ends. Thoughts?
bit surprised that you need to ask given the deep seated conservatism on this forum. YBW posters would prefer a long keel with attached rudder and a cutter rig. Anything else is modern flim flam! :D

might also be related to the skill and number of crew on the average cruising yacht. If you offered the average cruising sailor a boat capable of say 20kn and with all the go faster bits of the VOR boats he wouldnt want to know
 

Birdseye

Well-known member
Joined
9 Mar 2003
Messages
28,429
Location
s e wales
Visit site
I always thought the Prout rig was for easy downwind sailing. There was a point in history when Prout catamarans had done more ocean miles between them than an other multihull. You still seem to find examples of them tucked away in far flung places. A very robust little catamaran
As an ex owner of a Prout, I can certainly confim that it wasnt for upwind ability, of which they didnt have much.
 

geem

Well-known member
Joined
27 Apr 2006
Messages
8,043
Location
Caribbean
Visit site
As an ex owner of a Prout, I can certainly confim that it wasnt for upwind ability, of which they didnt have much.
It depends which model you had. The best performing upwind model of the smaller Prouts was the preElite Snowgoose 37. It had narrow hulls, a lot less weight and a single engine. We could out point any of the bilge keel cruisers in our local sailing club by a considerable margin but we had laminate sails and an 8ft taller than standard rig. The Prout 31 by comparison was really a motorsailor.
 
Last edited:
Top