A1Sailor
...
All seems a bit slow - it has been a month!
UPDATE just in:
EASTERN NORTH ATLANTIC.
NUMEROUS CONTAINERS ADRIFT VICINITY 47° 52.4'N 009° 37.0'W AT 08 AUG 2012 at 1950UTC
The above location suggests that they are from MSC Flaminia either jettisoned or slipped over the side due to listing?
Specifically posted for Roberto.![]()
How can they declare a general average when its the ships head office and the captain that have put it in this position ?, it could have been safely in a port weeks ago had they not messed about towing it in circles
Surely all the blame and the resulting losses should be put firmly on the shipping company and they lack of decisive action
My emphasis.General average requires three elements which are clearly stated by Mr. Justice Grier in Barnard v. Adams:
"1st. A common danger: a danger in which vessel, cargo and crew all participate; a danger imminent and apparently 'inevitable,' except by voluntarily incurring the loss of a portion of the whole to save the remainder."
"2nd. There must be a voluntary jettison, jactus, or casting away, of some portion of the joint concern for the purpose of avoiding this imminent peril, periculi imminentis evitandi causa, or, in other words, a transfer of the peril from the whole to a particular portion of the whole."
"3rd. This attempt to avoid the imminent common peril must be successful".
Meanwhile she drifts along under an Answering Pennant + Flag 'D' which cannot be good in storm Force 10 conditions!
Poetic licence...The vessel is presently being towed towards Europe
Interesting - the link you posted says this:
My emphasis.
I haven't read anything so far that suggests there has been a voluntary sacrificing of any part of the cargo in order to save the rest. Have I missed something?
See my message #194 then have a re-think?![]()
I had read #194. It is complete speculation that the containers in the water are due to jetissoning. #195 and #196 suggest that the containers are unlikely to have been jetissoned intentionally.
Is there any evidence that the containers have been jetissoned?
Not sure how, without cranes (and if cranes, without crane power) you'd get the boxes over the side.
Beam on to a F10 might do it...
Don't think we're there yet!
Another bloody mess,should have been in a port weeks ago,in a controlled situation.
Now it's going to sink,releasing the lot uncontrolled into the ocean
The fire started in Number 4 hold and I have heard unofficially that the cause just might be Calcium Hypochlorite which carries the great known risk of self combustion. Apparently, it has been the most common form of fire on box ships over the past decades!![]()
It does look suspicious if no port will let her in, nor even approach the coast into relatively sheltered waters. Someone must know by now what is onboard that is causing the outbreak of caution.
Maybe she's carrying some humanitarian aid and other "toys" for the Syrian rebels -- of the kind that goes whooosh-kaboom !!! Or maybe just some dangerous chemicals or whatever.
Wouldn't want that lot near any population centre, if that's what she's carrying.
Plomong
lenseman suggested nearly a month ago that the ship might have some pretty combustable items on board.
Anybody know for sure what's on board? Presumably the owners might...