Robin
Well-known member
B.B.. But I just recently read a new study that shows where I live will be UNDER water by 2030. SOMETHING has to be done and done urgently, Where do I get some seagrass plants???
I don't feel that a few seagrass plants will help, but buy a plot of land elsewhere slightly higher, and in a few years put in planning application for a marina !B.B.. But I just recently read a new study that shows where I live will be UNDER water by 2030. SOMETHING has to be done and done urgently, Where do I get some seagrass plants???
If it's anything like carbon offsetting we'll sort this out by selling water to Africa where it's too dry, and then just consider the problem fixed once everyone involved is sufficiently wealthy.B.B.. But I just recently read a new study that shows where I live will be UNDER water by 2030. SOMETHING has to be done and done urgently, Where do I get some seagrass plants???
I live in a marina now. but it will be underwater by 2030, maybe I'd better be investing in scuba gear.I don't feel that a few seagrass plants will help, but buy a plot of land elsewhere slightly higher, and in a few years put in planning application for a marina !
If it's measurable I suspect it's well outweighed by clathrate release from cold places gradually getting warmer, tramp releases from leaky oil field pipework, farting mammals and releases from sewage farms; we can do things about two of those with far better ROI than would be obtained by hiring anchor stasi. Farting mammals in the foodchain can be rendered less windy by adjusting their diet, although the ROI is more nebulous. The central flaw is that there's no hard science(or at least none they are prepared to consider) to base this nonsense on so we get a load of handwringing 'precautionary principle' rubbish about how it might be bad so we should do X regardless.Agreed, the research on carbon capture is very shaky. When it breaks down it also releases methane which is orders of magnitude worse than carbon. Unfortunately the studies on that measured very little methane output but acknowledge it was hard to measure in open ocean. I feel like a proper methane study would be time well spent if we’re to avoid sleepwalking into a methane crisis by “fixing” the carbon crisis. The sad reality is that most genuinely captured carbon on the planet was created before there were things capable of eating it and producing other products such as methane. If we bury wood now we will never manufacture coal because nature has moved on.
There is good science behind some climate change mitigation (it's already too late to call it prevention), but far too many projects are just plain greenwashing. I'd happily give up anchoring in genuinely vulnerable areas, but first I want evidence that it will make a difference. The evidence that has been presented regarding eel grass in Studland Bay looks to me to be a "We need evidence that proves our point. That data point doesn't, so it must be wrong; this one does, so it's clearly right." It's pretty much exactly what Wakefield did to kick off the autism/vaccination scare.The idea seagrass is a viable or scalable means of offsetting CO2 output is one of the stupider ideas I've read about this year, closely followed by the idea that leisure craft anchors are having a measurable effect on that offset.
I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...This 'fisheries patrol' boat was the same boat i saw a week previous in south deep doing 20knts ?
I didnt, but now wish i had.I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...
I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...
I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...
I don't think there's a statute of limitations for speeding in boats and if there were it would be longer than a month.I didnt, but now wish i had.
I assumed they were on the way to some sort of emergency.
I dont have video evidence so it would be my word against theirs.I don't think there's a statute of limitations for speeding in boats and if there were it would be longer than a month.
AIS can and often is turned off on official or military vessels is it not?
That link is a slightly different and rather positive spin on the same story below which says, that so far, the efforts have not worked out as they had hoped... but they are stepping up the programme.It seems as if the area of seagrass in the Solent and Plymouth is going to be rapidly expanding.
UK's largest ever seagrass project targets the Solent and Plymouth waters - Marine Industry News