Conservation is the priority at Studland warns MMO.

Boathook

Well-known member
Joined
5 Oct 2001
Messages
7,819
Location
Surrey & boat in Dorset.
Visit site
B.B.. But I just recently read a new study that shows where I live will be UNDER water by 2030. SOMETHING has to be done and done urgently, Where do I get some seagrass plants??? :eek:
I don't feel that a few seagrass plants will help, but buy a plot of land elsewhere slightly higher, and in a few years put in planning application for a marina !
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
11,336
Visit site
B.B.. But I just recently read a new study that shows where I live will be UNDER water by 2030. SOMETHING has to be done and done urgently, Where do I get some seagrass plants??? :eek:
If it's anything like carbon offsetting we'll sort this out by selling water to Africa where it's too dry, and then just consider the problem fixed once everyone involved is sufficiently wealthy.
 

penfold

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2003
Messages
7,732
Location
On the Clyde
Visit site
Agreed, the research on carbon capture is very shaky. When it breaks down it also releases methane which is orders of magnitude worse than carbon. Unfortunately the studies on that measured very little methane output but acknowledge it was hard to measure in open ocean. I feel like a proper methane study would be time well spent if we’re to avoid sleepwalking into a methane crisis by “fixing” the carbon crisis. The sad reality is that most genuinely captured carbon on the planet was created before there were things capable of eating it and producing other products such as methane. If we bury wood now we will never manufacture coal because nature has moved on.
If it's measurable I suspect it's well outweighed by clathrate release from cold places gradually getting warmer, tramp releases from leaky oil field pipework, farting mammals and releases from sewage farms; we can do things about two of those with far better ROI than would be obtained by hiring anchor stasi. Farting mammals in the foodchain can be rendered less windy by adjusting their diet, although the ROI is more nebulous. The central flaw is that there's no hard science(or at least none they are prepared to consider) to base this nonsense on so we get a load of handwringing 'precautionary principle' rubbish about how it might be bad so we should do X regardless.
 

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
22,858
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
The idea seagrass is a viable or scalable means of offsetting CO2 output is one of the stupider ideas I've read about this year, closely followed by the idea that leisure craft anchors are having a measurable effect on that offset.
There is good science behind some climate change mitigation (it's already too late to call it prevention), but far too many projects are just plain greenwashing. I'd happily give up anchoring in genuinely vulnerable areas, but first I want evidence that it will make a difference. The evidence that has been presented regarding eel grass in Studland Bay looks to me to be a "We need evidence that proves our point. That data point doesn't, so it must be wrong; this one does, so it's clearly right." It's pretty much exactly what Wakefield did to kick off the autism/vaccination scare.
 

Oscar24

Active member
Joined
26 Aug 2011
Messages
905
Location
Poole
Visit site
I picked up a buoy a couple of weeks ago in Studland bay, and within 10 minutes was approached by a 'fisheries patrol' boat asking me if i knew about the no anchoring zone. I politely informed them i did and is why i picked up the buoy. They then wanted to hand me some 'flyer' paperwork which i declined.
The three people onboard all decked out in matching kit in a boat which was fully kitted out including having a FLIR camera. (quite some £ spent on it) then proceeded to follow any boats which came into the bay and presumably ask the same questions.
It was a quiet day so very few boats were in the bay and nearly all of them were using the buoys, but i can see this getting 'messy' on a busy bank holiday weekend.
This 'fisheries patrol' boat was the same boat i saw a week previous in south deep doing 20knts ?
 

Robin

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,063
Location
high and dry on north island
Visit site
I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...

In hot pursuit of an escaped Studland seahorse having been 'touched inappropriately' by a rubber clad pervert and trying hard to reach it's cuddly buddies in their colony inside of Poole's upper reaches?:eek:

Was there another RIB following close behind with the Countryfile luvvies and local Echo 'reporters' on board too? :ROFLMAO:
 

penfold

Well-known member
Joined
25 Aug 2003
Messages
7,732
Location
On the Clyde
Visit site
I hope you reported it to the Harbour Master. I can imagine several scenarios where that would be entirely justified, but...
I didnt, but now wish i had.
I assumed they were on the way to some sort of emergency.
I don't think there's a statute of limitations for speeding in boats and if there were it would be longer than a month.
 

oldharry

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
9,845
Location
North from the Nab about 10 miles
Visit site
Ais fitted? Thats like speeding in a vehicle with a tachograph fitted. Got caught that way by the German Police many years ago driving a 7.5 tonner down the autobahn at UK speeds. Should have checked local speed limits for our vehicle!
 

Moonbeam

Active member
Joined
15 Mar 2010
Messages
546
Location
South Devon
Visit site

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
11,336
Visit site
Surely the root of this whole fiasco is that Seagrass is very hard to grow. If it's easy to grow then we can lift any and all restrictions, if not then we mustn't pin any CO2 reductions to these crazy schemes. These would appear to be mutually exclusive outcomes, yet the same people seem to peddle both.
 
Top