Colreg Alert: 40kt 41' Drone to be Patrolling Channel!

dom

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2003
Messages
7,145
Visit site
According to today's Telegraph:

"The 41-foot unmanned boat with radar and camera and capable of speeds of more than 40 knots was tested on Thursday in the straits of Dover as a new technique to help detect and intercept migrant boats and catch smugglers. "
Home Office to deploy 'stealth squad' of speedboats and jet skis to catch Channel migrants

One wonders:
(a) if the Artificial Intelligence/Computer systems controlling these vessels will follow the Colregs per se or the many notions people have on here :rolleyes:
and
(b) how the AI bots will interpret the Colregs' many grey areas o_O

:)
 

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
23,974
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
Having spent far too much time here, I'd program it to think, "Is there a possible risk of collision? If yes, bugger off", but that won't work if it makes the mistake of trying to come into Portsmouth on a sunny Sunday afternoon, or any number of daily situations in the Dover Straits
 

ryanroberts

Well-known member
Joined
25 Jul 2019
Messages
894
Visit site
The cost of the "AI" is surely going to outstrip the wage costs of some people to steer the boat, particularly as it will need people on shore monitoring it. That's assuming it even works. Let's hope it doesn't plow into a boat full oh photogenic migrants, we will never hear the end of it.
 

Biggles Wader

Well-known member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
10,995
Location
London
Visit site
If there is no one aboard how will it intercept migrants and catch smugglers? The best it could do is tell a grown up to come out in a real boat with a real crew to do the job.
 

LittleSister

Well-known member
Joined
12 Nov 2007
Messages
18,738
Location
Me Norfolk/Suffolk border - Boat Deben & Southwold
Visit site
If there is no one aboard how will it intercept migrants and catch smugglers? The best it could do is tell a grown up to come out in a real boat with a real crew to do the job.

I suspect you are mistaking the fundamental nature of the task. Certain newspapers have wailed 'Something must be done!'. The Government can now say 'Something has been done'.
 

25931

Well-known member
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Messages
5,383
Location
Portugal-Algarve
Visit site
If there is no one aboard how will it intercept migrants and catch smugglers? The best it could do is tell a grown up to come out in a real boat with a real crew to do the job.
Perhaps the idea is to keep crossing the immigrants bows being closer each time creating an uncomfortable sea.
 

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
21,284
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
"Intercept" surely means "Go & collect them with a manned craft" with the intention of bringing them safely to Dover so they can be processed & allotted a suitable "place of refuge"
It will not stop the boats, only streamline the collection process & enable immigration to intercept every boat thus ensuring that they all get hotel rooms.
It would save patrolling for hours on end with a boat manned with a crew of 8 or more.
Bow waves may sink small craft, but can one seriously think that the UK govt could get away with that.
 

dunedin

Well-known member
Joined
3 Feb 2004
Messages
14,082
Location
Boat (over winters in) the Clyde
Visit site
The cost of the "AI" is surely going to outstrip the wage costs of some people to steer the boat, particularly as it will need people on shore monitoring it. That's assuming it even works. Let's hope it doesn't plow into a boat full oh photogenic migrants, we will never hear the end of it.

Then a quick search for the crony who is getting paid for the tech, that seems to be the most common answer these days.
 

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
21,284
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
Maneuverability from a remote position whilst observing through a camera must be quite difficult at 40kts
As for mowing down those in illegal inflatables- that would go down well with the media. If anyone wanted "murdering" perhaps one should direct their attention toward the French authorities, who are failing to prevent the farce happening in the first place.
It might also be considered that perhaps there might JUST be 10% who really do need asylum. If one were a person who has lost everything inc part of one's family, are we a nation so devoid of passion that we want to drown them mid channel?
The other 90% however, are a different kettle of fish & the French can trawl them up as part of their new found quotas perhaps.
 
Top