Cheap Chinese AIS Transponder

Bi111ion

Well-Known Member
Joined
5 Aug 2012
Messages
352
Visit site
I just bought a Matsutec HP-33 A combined GPS and AIS transponder. At £270 + import duty duty it seems like it is good value. Not installed it permanently yet but initial findings on my blog. I have been waiting for transponders to fall in price and it looks like it has now happened. They are not inherently harder to make than a receiver, it is only low power transmitter and these days I am sure it is all done in a software defined radio. You will notice the only visible difference to the HP-33 which is just a GPS is the addition of a coax antenna socket. Mostly it is firmware it seems.
 
Doesn't mean it wouldn't work, and the chances of anyone inspecting it are very small.

No, it doesn't. However, with something that transmits, if it were to have a hissy fit and start transmitting indiscriminately, the chance of the owner being embarrassed is higher than a non-transmitting bit of kit.
 
No, it doesn't. However, with something that transmits, if it were to have a hissy fit and start transmitting indiscriminately, the chance of the owner being embarrassed is higher than a non-transmitting bit of kit.

:) True!

Frankly, I'd be more concerned about the presumed absence of any local service/repair possibilities.
 
pvb: I think even with name brands I would have to post it to somewhere to have it fixed, and it came from China pretty quickly. . Angus: that is a fair point, AIS transmission is critical especially in crowded waters. I'll check the manual to see what standards it says it meets.
ps Angus: I like your website. I wrote a Seatalk interpreter too but its not as nicely coded as yours
 
Last edited:
pvb: I think even with name brands I would have to post it to somewhere to have it fixed, and it came from China pretty quickly. . Angus: that is a fair point, AIS transmission is critical especially in crowded waters. I'll check the manual to see what standards it says it meets.
Sorry, is it just me but IMHO AIS apart from that shown by larger commercial vessels, is a right PIA in crowded waters. On a busy Summer Saturday in the Solent AIS becomes completely useless, especially the volume of AIS ghosts from those with GPS sets that simply don't know where they are. My personal opinion is that Class B transponders should be switched off in crowded waters unless its foggy e.g. Just light fog lights on a car.
 
Sorry, is it just me but IMHO AIS apart from that shown by larger commercial vessels, is a right PIA in crowded waters. On a busy Summer Saturday in the Solent AIS becomes completely useless, especially the volume of AIS ghosts from those with GPS sets that simply don't know where they are. My personal opinion is that Class B transponders should be switched off in crowded waters unless its foggy e.g. Just light fog lights on a car.
Why do you thin there are so many incorrect positions reported? I wonder if AIS transponders are meant not to report the position if they do not have a good fix?
 
Sorry, is it just me but IMHO AIS apart from that shown by larger commercial vessels, is a right PIA in crowded waters. On a busy Summer Saturday in the Solent AIS becomes completely useless, especially the volume of AIS ghosts from those with GPS sets that simply don't know where they are. My personal opinion is that Class B transponders should be switched off in crowded waters unless its foggy e.g. Just light fog lights on a car.

Well said, even on the East Coast in the Rivers Class B is a PIA, particularily those people who leave them switched on in a marina, I have the AIS alarms turned off on my receiver these days and would only turn on in Fog.

As for imports that are not Type Approved well if you want to use them and they cause spurious transmissions you deserve to have the book thrown at you. Type approval is to ensure the kit meets the relevant standards, these include not only the message format but that the transmitter is transmitting to spec and not pumping out RF at odd frequencies that can screw up reception for everyone else. Remember AIS transmits in the same waveband as normal VHF its only got to drift a bit to screw up normal transmissions.
 
As for imports that are not Type Approved well if you want to use them and they cause spurious transmissions you deserve to have the book thrown at you. Type approval is to ensure the kit meets the relevant standards, these include not only the message format but that the transmitter is transmitting to spec and not pumping out RF at odd frequencies that can screw up reception for everyone else. Remember AIS transmits in the same waveband as normal VHF its only got to drift a bit to screw up normal transmissions.
All the iec and itu specs are listed here..
http://huayang-tech.en.alibaba.com/...ec_HP_33A_4_3_marine_GPS_AIS_transponder.html
 
Don't suppose you know how much their MOB-100 costs? Looks like a good product if competitively priced.
 
A few seconds Google shows it has Chinese CCS certificate and Product Type Approval of CFR(China Fishing Vessel Register).

That doesn't really mean anything though, does it? The CE marking and type approval regime that the EU and British Standards before that have built up over many decades experience is pretty good; I have never heard of anyone buying a transmitting radio (of any kind - phones, walky-talkies, CB, HAM, radio control, aeronautical or marine) that has not done the job it is intended to do in a safe way. For all we know those standards might not even exist or test anything useful at all.

If you want to bypass certification by buying dubious imported equipment like 2 stroke outboards on Ebay, well you will almost certainly get away with it and not do anyone too much harm. But with radio transmitting equipment you can very easily cause havoc over a wide area with safety implications, and in addition, being AIS, you are telling everyone who you are and where you are. I can't think of a better way to invite unwelcome attention from a civil servant with a knack for prosecuting people.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't really mean anything though, does it?
No idea, just spreading the info :)
Also no idea what EU standards apply to ais transponders or if the global specs exceed or match them.
It might be unlikely for this particular unit to bother with the process anyway, icom gave up with EU badged marine ssb radios.
 
That doesn't really mean anything though, does it? e.
I am not sure we should be too quick to dismiss Chinese certification. Of course there is corruption in China, but I think we have seen plenty of corruption in the EU, and indeed allegations of corruption over type approval of Marine HF/MF transceivers. China is a very big maritime nation, and the company selling this unit mainly sell to the professional rather than leisure market (things like bridge watch alarm systems etc). China also has some very crowded marine environments around major ports and fishing areas. I think if they were making defective AIS equipment it would show up quickly in their home market. Of course it is true that in the EU we should use type approved equipment if we can (for SSBs that will not be possible of course if ICOM do not apply)....but I would be hesitant to imply that equipment that has passed other economic areas type approval and not our own is necessarily of a lower standard.
 
Bit of marketing involved? My H/H VHF is identical to the CE marked model, just bought in the US. Same with boats, they don't CE the ones sold in the US, as they are cheaper and it might encourage imports to the EU and damage the inflated market. I very much doubt they build to a lesser spec for the non EU trade. And, the certification cost can't be a big deal.
 
Top