Birdseye
Well-Known Member
I am always thinking of the options for 'the next boat', as I think many of us do. I am thinking long term trips - round UK, Atlantic islands etc. up to 33 feet, quite possibly long keel (think Nic 31, Vancouver 32, Tradewind 33). However, there are plenty of perfectly respectable boats which I rule out because they have wheel steering and I have been trying to rationalise my reasons for doing so. I like tillers for the sense of a direct connection with the boat and the water flowing past. Also the lack of an obstruction in the middle of the cockpit, the ease of connection to wind vane self steering and simplicity of the engineering involved. I think it is possibly the latter point which concerns me most about wheel steering - all the linkages, gears, connections and bearings which simply represent something else to maintain and potentially go wrong at inconvenient times. There is so much less to go wrong with a stick of wood and its connection to the rudder. Am I wrong? Should I be adding Moody and Scanmar 33s to my list?
Chosing a boat isnt a rational process. Owning one isnt either. So why talk yourself out of something you prefer. Just spend your money on what you like.
A wheel is not necessarily a maintenance issue. My wheel has a rod linkage with rose joints and its maintenance free. I would be less happy with a wire rope / pulley system and would avoid a hydraulic system altogether. Personally I have had tillers and wheels and if anything prefer wheels. With my 30 inch wheel I have something like 15 ft of rim movement lock to lock without having to move myself or be sat at the front of the cockpit with a tiller sweeping across in everyones way. On the other hand the wheel is a PITA in port taking up lots of cockpit room. Mind you, its all a bit theoretical because on passage I always use the autohelm, a below decks Robertson hydraulica system which is first class and doesnt lose concentration.
Its another Whitlock Cobra by the way.