taz
Well-Known Member
Erm............erm.....................WOW
Stunning
Have you thought about a career change![]()
I doupt it, but I have![]()
As promised here is a geeky vid of the anchor camera.
...
Erik, it sounds very smug, I apologise, but truthfully the boat feels perfect.
...
Looking back now, if I had my time over again, I would buy the boat from them and not change a thing.
...
Ok, it's a dirty job to criticise anything on Match, but someone's got to do it.As promised here is a geeky vid of the anchor camera.
Because as I said in my previous post, on some boats you just can't see the anchor stowing itself however far you lean over the rail. I don't know whether that's the case on Match but it certainly was on one of my previous boats. Also if you're singlehanded or as is often the case with me, you have guests on board who don't really know what they're doing, it's better to control the whole operation from the helm and thats much easier if you can see what's happening. IMHO, this is a worthwile extra and not just a geeky gimmickI for one still don't get what's wrong in going at the bow when recovering the anchor, and manage the maneuver from there.
+1. Each to their own of course, but yes I agree both those points Deleted User. The bow flare on Match is, like on many planing boats, so large that seeing the thing as it goes into the hawse slot involves leaning well over the rail. Though i did have a curly wire remote added on M2, in addition to the on-deck footswitches, to let me do this if I want. And secondly, I completely share your comment on guests (!). I like the ability to automate and control the whole thing from the helm to avoid the need for a guest volunteer who wont understand the tricks of getting the anchor to flip the right way up.Because as I said in my previous post, on some boats you just can't see the anchor stowing itself however far you lean over the rail. I don't know whether that's the case on Match but it certainly was on one of my previous boats. Also if you're singlehanded or as is often the case with me, you have guests on board who don't really know what they're doing, it's better to control the whole operation from the helm and thats much easier if you can see what's happening. IMHO, this is a worthwile extra and not just a geeky gimmick
Many thanks! I gotta say, muchly italian inspiredReally cool interiors, though.![]()
Well, the point re. guests unable to help is not relevant, methink.I agree both those points Deleted User.
Mmm, how many boats have got that facility? Yes sure if you've got remote throttle control then you can do it all yourself from the bow but for those that haven't a camera might be a useful additionWith "my" technique, it's sufficient to have a remote control for throttles
I don't agree. The hull should be designed as a hull ie to deal with the sea, and the guard rails for safety plus aesthetics. Then the anchor has to be made to fit. Designing the hull around being able to see the anchor isn't the way to do it, imhoOtoh, I see your point re. being difficult to see the anchor in some boats, though I'd be tempted to call it a poor design, at least to some extent...
I do think it is pointless. What matters is the angle at which the chain approaches the boat (at the first pulley or the hawsepipe or whatever). I can see that angle with the camera and adjusts the boat's position to optimise the angle. Sure I could also see it by looking at the chain stnading at the bow, and could predict it if I stood looking at the chain on the seabed, so those are alternative ways of getting the same data, but fundamentally the only value that matters is the chain's angle at the point it first touches the boat and I can get that from the camera. There are plenty of anchorages, like deep dark Vilelfranche where my video above was shot, where you have no chance to see the chain on the seabed anywayBut what I still don't get is if you think it's pointless to be able to see/follow the chain path while recovering it.![]()