webcraft
Well-Known Member
Can't afford a Metz now Salty John has packed up, what is the next best option?
- W
- W
Really can't afford £20? Time to give up boat ownership!
Don't believe the hype! A coathanger is all you need, and the half wave dipole will work better than the Metz.
or save even more by just folding 49cm of stripped shield back and tape it to the outside of the coax insulation. Hoist it on a spare halyard and bob's your uncle!Don't believe the hype! A coathanger is all you need, and the half wave dipole will work better than the Metz.
View attachment 118884
I've been using a home-made AIS antenna of this kind for ages. Works fine, and is precisely the right length for the AIS wavelength! It will be replaced next week, though.Don't believe the hype! A coathanger is all you need, and the half wave dipole will work better than the Metz.
View attachment 118884
Interesting. You quote 49mm and three other online sources say 45.5, 46.3 and 47.7mm for Marine VHFDon't believe the hype! A coathanger is all you need, and the half wave dipole will work better than the Metz.
View attachment 118884
I think (I'd have to look it up again) that 49 is correct for AIS.Interesting. You quote 49mm and three other online sources say 45.5, 46.3 and 47.7mm for Marine VHF
Maybe if I hadn't already spent £170 on a tin of antifoul , £200 on a new mooring riser and £200 on new locker lids I might agree with you.
If £20 means nothing to you I can send you my bank details . . . .
- W
Just did the sums and it's 46 for AIS, for a half-wave dipoleI think (I'd have to look it up again) that 49 is correct for AIS.
It's just a picture, I assume that people will look up the exact figure. Normally the Channel 16 one is used. Any of those would beat the Metz though!Interesting. You quote 49mm and three other online sources say 45.5, 46.3 and 47.7mm for Marine VHF
How does it 'consistently outperform all its rivals' ? You cant beat the laws of physics by throwing money at a bit of wire...Seriously? Can't find £20?
Honestly, in my not inconsiderable experience of installing VHF antennas and being called out to investigate VHF faults I've concluded that there is no second best. The Metz is the only design currently on the market below £100 that I've never seen fail and it consistently out performs all it's rivals
Eat beans on toast for a week and buy a Metz!
Why are they crappy ? they appear to be made by shakespear who make good antennas.. Been on two seperate boats with Vitronix and both could pick up vhf transmissions from hell of a distance.. quite impressive considering the Vitronix like most other antennas are package with crappy rg58.. Pointless buying a high quality antenna if your going to use rg58 coax as you could lose up to 2/3 of your transmitted power in the coaxa crappy Vitronix antenna
how have you tested this?and it consistently out performs all it's rivals
It depends how you mount it, whether you have spreaders, and who's looking.What would it look like up the mast though?
Why are they crappy ?
I think taping the folded-back inner to the outside is frowned-upon, and it ought to stand off and inch or two. But basically it does work.or save even more by just folding 49cm of stripped shield back and tape it to the outside of the coax insulation. Hoist it on a spare halyard and bob's your uncle!