dom
Well-Known Member
There's an old saying that a boat won't sail to windward unless it heels easily. Some older boats, such as those with lots of tumble home, were designed to be sailed well-heeled, but others, such as my last boat -a Sadler29- sail better more upright. What you regard as a good cruising boat is a matter of choice and ultimately a good design will be a compromise. Personally, I prefer a boat that doesn't need to be reefed early, even if the price is sailing at more heel, but good windward sailing and large cabin volumes are not easily combined.
Absolutely not seeking to be controversial here, but "this notion represents some of the biggest bullshit to found on the pontoons today!" That is according to Jean Marie Finot, designer of more Vendee Globe and other fast yachts than one can think of.
If I recall his speech correctly, he argued that the claim is true in the limited case of a semi-protected bay running a chop which would unsettle a wider boat. He offered Dragons as the epitome of such thinking.
He went on to argue that in the absence of a rating rule, power is prime and that power increases broadly in line with the cube of beam whereas drag closer to the square. He argued that the ultimate constraint comes in the form of rig height, although this can to some extent be ameliorated with square-top mains. Foils are a natural evolution in this thinking.
I can also say that (unfair as the comparison is) when hammering to windward against a big blow, something like an Open 50 would rip apart any traditional design of similar proportions.
Edit: apols for thread drift. Obviously nothing to do with a Bav 34
Last edited:

