Arson attack in Grimsby

fredrussell

Well-known member
Joined
24 Mar 2015
Messages
3,471
Visit site
It’s heart breaking really and I think perhaps only a boat owner could understand the vast amount of hours and effort put into making a boat ‘yours’. I put some money in the pot, poor sod.
 

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,363
Visit site
Roberts insurance isn't covering this.

I wonder why the insurance won't cover it? Seems to be to be exactly what insurance is for.

Doesn't look the sort of boat you'd go third party only on.
 

RunAgroundHard

Well-known member
Joined
20 Aug 2022
Messages
2,243
Visit site
Was going to say that looks like a Rival looking at the bulkhead shape then saw the picture below!

Horrible situation.

Indeed a horrible situation. Yes, it is Rival 34, might be a 32, I can't tell the difference between them. The boat could easily have burned to the ground as likely the GRP resins are flammable. It might be salvageable if the GRP has not been damaged by heat and flames, but at what cost? Materials alone would be high cost, never mind any associated labour.

It looks like a write off to me, cut ones losses, salvage any recoverable item and sell on, but even then there is limited market for old designs and equipment. Perhaps one of the boat breaking companies would take it as is.

A lot of emotion tied up in such a decision to scrap. Very sad.
 

RupertW

Well-known member
Joined
20 Mar 2002
Messages
10,267
Location
Greenwich
Visit site
Roberts insurance isn't covering this.

I wonder why the insurance won't cover it? Seems to be to be exactly what insurance is for.

Doesn't look the sort of boat you'd go third party only on.
The article says he did go only for third party but thought that included fire and theft. It‘s too late for him as he won’t be able to spend his life savings twice but a healthy reminder to the rest of us that third party is only any use if we can happily afford to start again. I’m alos not quite sure how he knows it’s arson, but I might have missed that bit.
 

johnalison

Well-known member
Joined
14 Feb 2007
Messages
40,844
Location
Essex
Visit site
The article says he did go only for third party but thought that included fire and theft. It‘s too late for him as he won’t be able to spend his life savings twice but a healthy reminder to the rest of us that third party is only any use if we can happily afford to start again. I’m alos not quite sure how he knows it’s arson, but I might have missed that bit.
'Third party, fire and theft' is/was a common mode of car insurance, so I can see how he might have got the idea from that he was covered, but I'm afraid it was a bit naive to assume so. However, I hope that he and his mates can get him on the water again.
 

mainsail1

Well-known member
Joined
27 May 2008
Messages
2,399
Location
Now in the Med
Visit site
Looking at the seat of the fire I am not so sure this is arson but I don't have all the facts. I wonder if he had any Acetone onboard? Rags contaminated with Acetone can easily self ignite and have caused fires on boats in the past.
 

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,363
Visit site
Looking at the seat of the fire I am not so sure this is arson but I don't have all the facts. I wonder if he had any Acetone onboard? Rags contaminated with Acetone can easily self ignite and have caused fires on boats in the past.

Arson is a stretch. According to the gofundme explanation most likely a homeless person broke in to sleep on board and accidentally caused the fire. Still completely unacceptable, but not arson.
 

RivalRedwing

Well-known member
Joined
9 Nov 2004
Messages
3,648
Location
Rochester, UK, boat in SYH
Visit site
Indeed a horrible situation. Yes, it is Rival 34, might be a 32, I can't tell the difference between them. The boat could easily have burned to the ground as likely the GRP resins are flammable. It might be salvageable if the GRP has not been damaged by heat and flames, but at what cost? Materials alone would be high cost, never mind any associated labour.

It looks like a write off to me, cut ones losses, salvage any recoverable item and sell on, but even then there is limited market for old designs and equipment. Perhaps one of the boat breaking companies would take it as is.

A lot of emotion tied up in such a decision to scrap. Very sad.
R34
 

kacecar

Active member
Joined
29 Oct 2007
Messages
240
Location
UK
Visit site
The owner has posted about this on YouTube (sorry, don't know how to include a useful link). Apparently the boat was broken into through the front hatch, and subsequently was discovered on fire but the reason for the fire is not known, deliberate or accidental, is not clear - it seems images of the intruder were recorded by a security camera somewhere.
 

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,363
Visit site
Some pretty good videos of the boat underway as well. Clearly not just a dreamer using it as a houseboat.
 

Sandydog2

Well-known member
Joined
5 Feb 2019
Messages
525
Visit site
There is CCTV of someone climbing the marina fence 30 minutes before the fire then leaving shortly after.

That seems a very short time for a rough sleeper seeking shelter to accidentally start a fire.

The gofundme doesn't say its being run by his yacht club. How do you check that any particular GofundMe is legitimate ? I am always rather cautious. I tried Google but that raised more questions than it answered.
 

Mark-1

Well-known member
Joined
22 Sep 2008
Messages
4,363
Visit site
There is CCTV of someone climbing the marina fence 30 minutes before the fire then leaving shortly after.

That seems a very short time for a rough sleeper seeking shelter to accidentally start a fire.

The gofundme doesn't say its being run by his yacht club. How do you check that any particular GofundMe is legitimate ? I am always rather cautious. I tried Google but that raised more questions than it answered.

I have no idea how to check the gofundme but the incident itself seems beyond doubt. His boat *has* been burned somehow. Rough sleeper is just a theory.

If I was looking for a scam I'd say it was the "lack of insurance" aspect which seems slightly implausible for a tidy 34ft boat in regular use. (Unless he couldn't get a satisfactory survey?)

Personally I think all is exactly as it seems. Somehow he's had a fire on his boat and for some reason he's not insured.
 

Sandydog2

Well-known member
Joined
5 Feb 2019
Messages
525
Visit site
I have no idea how to check the gofundme but the incident itself seems beyond doubt. His boat *has* been burned somehow. Rough sleeper is just a theory.

If I was looking for a scam I'd say it was the "lack of insurance" aspect which seems slightly implausible for a tidy 34ft boat in regular use. (Unless he couldn't get a satisfactory survey?)

Personally I think all is exactly as it seems. Somehow he's had a fire on his boat and for some reason he's not insured.
I didn't doubt the yacht was burned. It's a great shame. I don't know what insurance companies do for suspected arson cases but would have thought that even with full insurance they wouldn't pay out until the investigation was completed. I thought it was the fire brigade who suspected arson due to the CCTV and the forced forepeak hatch.
 

penberth3

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2017
Messages
3,644
Visit site
There is CCTV of someone climbing the marina fence 30 minutes before the fire then leaving shortly after.

That seems a very short time for a rough sleeper seeking shelter to accidentally start a fire.

The gofundme doesn't say its being run by his yacht club. How do you check that any particular GofundMe is legitimate ? I am always rather cautious. I tried Google but that raised more questions than it answered.

That's good advice, scammers can jump in with fake accounts. It's best to wait a bit before you contribute.
 

prestomg27

Active member
Joined
24 May 2023
Messages
169
Visit site
I have no idea how to check the gofundme but the incident itself seems beyond doubt. His boat *has* been burned somehow. Rough sleeper is just a theory.

If I was looking for a scam I'd say it was the "lack of insurance" aspect which seems slightly implausible for a tidy 34ft boat in regular use. (Unless he couldn't get a satisfactory survey?)

Personally I think all is exactly as it seems. Somehow he's had a fire on his boat and for some reason he's not insured.

He was insured, just for 3rd party risks as i understand it.

My mgc27 is only insured 3rd party. The value isnt that high and there are far less restrictions on use with 3rd party insurance. It covers you if you hit something expensive. Just off to chip into his gofundme.
 
Top