matt1
Well-Known Member
I have a typical new boat B&G set up from 2018; VHF50, Zeus3 plotter, Triton 2 instruments and and an NSPL splitter. However it has AIS rx (rather than tx) which comes from the VHF - via the splitter (which is odd as I don't believe that was necessary - it may be a TX was fitted at some point in the build process but subsequently removed!)
Talking at the boat show, the consensus seemed to be to just fit any AIS tx box and plug into the splitter and then tell the Zeus to filter out my own MMSI - simple. However the recommended B&G/Raymarine/Vespa variants are circa £540 and I found a Digital Yacht AIT1500, that currently comes with a free AIS antenna for £399. I'm thinking I may just fit that as a standalone unit, with the supplied aerial on the pushpit (I accept range will be diminished). It has the benefit of some redundancy with the VHF aerial acting as a spare. Am I missing something? Is there any health risk in sitting next to a stubby aerial pumping out my position data? Is there a reason why the digital yacht AIS is so much cheaper? (they do a NMEA 2000 and 0183 versions but I wouldn't be networking it to anything so I guess that is irrelevant)
Talking at the boat show, the consensus seemed to be to just fit any AIS tx box and plug into the splitter and then tell the Zeus to filter out my own MMSI - simple. However the recommended B&G/Raymarine/Vespa variants are circa £540 and I found a Digital Yacht AIT1500, that currently comes with a free AIS antenna for £399. I'm thinking I may just fit that as a standalone unit, with the supplied aerial on the pushpit (I accept range will be diminished). It has the benefit of some redundancy with the VHF aerial acting as a spare. Am I missing something? Is there any health risk in sitting next to a stubby aerial pumping out my position data? Is there a reason why the digital yacht AIS is so much cheaper? (they do a NMEA 2000 and 0183 versions but I wouldn't be networking it to anything so I guess that is irrelevant)