AIS at the chartplotter

Sandy

Well-known member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
21,910
Location
On the Celtic Fringe
duckduckgo.com
Now you have an AIS you just need to figure out what it does and how it can be useful, sounds like you've splashed out on a handy timer but are still randomly trying to figure out when the egg is boiled in your head ..... ;)
But I've had AIS for years! It has sat down at the nav station. I fully understand what does, how it does it and why the system was introduced.
 

GHA

Well-known member
Joined
26 Jun 2013
Messages
12,517
Location
Hopefully somewhere warm
Visit site
But I've had AIS for years! It has sat down at the nav station. I fully understand what does, how it does it and why the system was introduced.
Doesn't sound like it from your posts, why have such useful info to hand but rely on your own perception which is orders of magnitude less accurate.

"If I feel that I'm going to get too close I lose a small amount of speed and the big ship will steam on by. I am not going to get to 95.67 meters from the other vessel and then ask the computer what I need to do. "

Feel like you're getting close?? Glance at the AIS data miles before any situation arises, hardly rocket science.

And what computer is telling you what to do? ?

No wonder they call us wafis.. what's rule 5 again...
 

RichardS

N/A
Joined
5 Nov 2009
Messages
29,236
Location
Home UK Midlands / Boat Croatia
Visit site
One of the uses for AIS that is seldom mentioned is when it can help you spot a ship coming out of a harbour long before it appears to the eye, as in places like Zeebrugge, or round a bend in the river, as in the Orwell, both something that the eyeball and even radar may be incapable of.
It is seldom mentioned ..... although it was in my Post #46. ;)

Richard
 

TernVI

Well-known member
Joined
8 Jul 2020
Messages
5,070
Visit site
The point of my question was to set the parameters for a trigonometry problem. You were saying it’s simple enough to check for constant bearing with a stanchion to determine risk of collision when crossing traffic. How simple making that “do I need to do something?” call is depends on how late you’re comfortable leaving it and what your safe passing distance is and I was going to illustrate that with an example of how much the bearing changes, or rather doesn’t, at the tcpa I’d like to know if I have problem. But if your parameters are different there’s not much point me wading through that trig :).

Bottom line: I used to think most vessels were on a roughly constant bearing until they were much closer than I was comfortable with. Some maths made me realise how little the bearing of a vessel that’s going to cross comfortably ahead can be changing when it’s 20 minutes away. No way I could possibly judge by eye their 2 or even 5 degree course tweak to avoid me. AIS not only gives me better info far further ahead so that I can plan dealing with multiple crossing vessels much further in advance, practice at cross referencing what I can see with what AIS tells me has vastly improved my ability to visually judge ranges and chance of collision.

Don’t take my word for the “how much does the bearing change at what tcpa” thing...run some numbers (even if you have to spend some time working out how to do an inverse tangent with the Mac OS calculator:)

Because it *isn’t* a game of chicken I want better information sooner, which is why I like AIS to supplement my eyes and hand bearing compass.
My feelings exactly, ever since I got my first 'NASA AIS Radar', which must have been about 20 years ago now? I had one of the first.

I think some people get too obsessed with a certain number for CPA, treating it as 'the one number that tells you everything'. It's not. A miss is as good as a mile when you pass behind a ship, expecting to pass half a mile under a ship's bow is 'close'. The old hand bearing malarkey helps visualise this sometimes. A bit like judging if you are laying a mark or not.

As for what tool is more useful than AIS in the Solent? Even a Naval Officer?

A chart is the right answer, tells you where the ships will go, and where they won't go.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,513
Visit site
It's funny, you don't see many arguments about why wind instruments aren't necessary, and they aren't even a safety feature
 

DJE

Well-known member
Joined
21 Jun 2004
Messages
7,666
Location
Fareham
www.casl.uk.com
Often when standing on and crossing ahead of a ship the CPA occurs after you have crossed his bow as he crosses your stern. So CPA might be 0.7 miles some time after you have passed 1.3 miles ahead. (Somehow that feels better than passing 0.7 miles ahead.) The Opencpn display plots the predicted positions of both vessels at CPA to make this clear.
 

Sandy

Well-known member
Joined
31 Aug 2011
Messages
21,910
Location
On the Celtic Fringe
duckduckgo.com
Doesn't sound like it from your posts, why have such useful info to hand but rely on your own perception which is orders of magnitude less accurate.

"If I feel that I'm going to get too close I lose a small amount of speed and the big ship will steam on by. I am not going to get to 95.67 meters from the other vessel and then ask the computer what I need to do. "

Feel like you're getting close?? Glance at the AIS data miles before any situation arises, hardly rocket science.

And what computer is telling you what to do? ?

No wonder they call us wafis.. what's rule 5 again...
Of course I know Route 5 and Rule 10. And be prepared to stand up in court an defend your decision (and more challengingly this forum).

I am quietly scratching my head here, can anybody admit to navigating a vessel purely on the electronic data available? In my experience the skipper has always popped there head out and taken a look, certainly standard procedure on my boat when I'm off watch and crew want something checked. What happens when computer says you are going to collide? The point I was trying to make, clearly made extremely poorly.

I can't believe that anybody gets there vessel as close to a ship as they dare, apart from the chap at Cowes Week a few years back. I'll need to re-read the MIAB report as it would be interesting to see if they were transmitting AIS they should have seen that big orange ship.
 

laika

Well-known member
Joined
6 Apr 2011
Messages
8,209
Location
London / Gosport
Visit site
I am not going to get to 95.67 meters from the other vessel and then ask the computer what I need to do.

I think we may be misunderstanding each other. I am one of the least "electronic" sailors on this forum and refer you to my answer to RichardS's question "what would you say is a more useful tool than AIS in the Solent?". I work out courses to steer manually, I write my pilotage notes which never include GPS waypoints (only objects I can get a depth or bearing on) in pencil on waterproof paper which I keep in my pocket and my AIS is normally off except for certain situations, notable among those is crossing channel traffic. In no way was I suggesting not using eyes or passing less than half a mile from a vessel. I believe (correct me if I'm wrong) that you were suggesting that the information AIS gives recreational sailors is entertaining but not really relevant if you are correctly using your eyes. The point I was trying to make is this:

Many of us probably start worrying about crossing vessels long before the closest point of approach. The problem with this is that if you run the numbers you see that (depending on your concept of "safe distance" and at what TCPA you want to take action, hence the reason for my question) the bearing on a vessel which will, in fact, pass a safe distance from you may not change sufficiently to be perceived with a hand bearing compass (much less a stanchion) from the deck of a moving yacht until it's much closer than we're comfortable with. We're all taught to check for constant bearings to determine risk of collision but no instructor ever pointed out to me how close a vessel needs to be before its bearing changes sufficiently to judge whether the CPA will be more or less than half a mile to a mile.

It's perfectly valid to point out that outside of a TSS and when sailing or when motoring with traffic crossing from our port side, as stand on vessels we shouldn't be taking action ourselves until another vessel *is* close enough to reliably use constant bearing to determine risk of collision. That doesn't stop me worrying about it long before hand and the supplemental info provided by AIS removes much of that worry, leading to a more enjoyable sail. Especially where I have multiple targets to worry about having better information sooner makes me feel more comfortable.

Obviously there are other situations (restricted vis, TSS, or where we're motoring or motorsailing and give way) when AIS (or radar) is much more handy but I don't think that's what either of us are discussing here.
 
Last edited:

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,513
Visit site
Is that because they aren't?
More that almost every yacht has wind instruments these days, and those are a similar cost to AIS transponder, probably more expensive in fact. It's not very often we see people mansplaining how they can tell the wind speed and direction with a moist finger, yet for some reason everyone feels compelled to explain that they have eyes when AIS comes into discussion.

And no, of course they aren't :D
 

capnsensible

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Messages
46,676
Location
Atlantic
Visit site
More that almost every yacht has wind instruments these days, and those are a similar cost to AIS transponder, probably more expensive in fact. It's not very often we see people mansplaining how they can tell the wind speed and direction with a moist finger, yet for some reason everyone feels compelled to explain that they have eyes when AIS comes into discussion.

And no, of course they aren't :D
Usual stuff, isn't it. Vital when racing. Generally very useful otherwise. But lots of people manage perfectly well without.

Wind vane at top of mast is jolly good tho.
 

laika

Well-known member
Joined
6 Apr 2011
Messages
8,209
Location
London / Gosport
Visit site
I can't believe that anybody gets there vessel as close to a ship as they dare

Here's our source of misunderstanding I think. I for one wasn't suggesting using AIS to minimise CPA or change what I regard as a safe passing distance. I'd be hard pressed to do that anyway because the oow of give-way commercial shipping probably has standing orders to pass you at a certain distance.

What I to want know in a channel crossing scenario is "Is that vessel going to pass me at a distance of more than my comfort threshold (which for many people will be somewhere between half a mile and a mile) or in the absence of other course changes, might I have to take action?" AIS answers that question for me much sooner than the naked eye, leading to a far more relaxed and enjoyable sailing. But then I acknowledge just generally worry too much :)
 
Last edited:

capnsensible

Well-known member
Joined
15 Mar 2007
Messages
46,676
Location
Atlantic
Visit site
Here's our source of misunderstanding I think. I for one wasn't suggesting using AIS to minimise CPA or change what I regard as a safe passing distance. I'd be hard pressed to do that anyway because the oow of give-way commercial shipping probably has standing orders to pass you at a certain distance.

What I to know in a channel crossing scenario is "Is that vessel going to pass me at a distance of more than my comfort threshold (which for many people will be somewhere between half a mile and a mile) or in the absence of other course changes, might I have to take action?" AIS answers that question for me much sooner than the naked eye, leading to a far more relaxed and enjoyable sailing. But then I acknowledge just generally worry too much :)
A way to practice is to combine using the compass and AIS together. Like learning radar on a clear day. Racing sailors often have a fine tuned sense of bearing change coz of all the practice they get. It certainly gave me a good awareness of it. So I feel comfortable because of heaps of practice. But the short cut is to know that a vessels bow wave cuts the horizon if you are sat in your average cockpit a bit under three miles. Speed estimation is more difficult but ships often do around 15 knots, some slower, some faster. So that's yer three miles in twelve minutes so plenty of time for hand compass practice in those quite wide parameters. A starting point.

Your second five hundred goes will be better than the first five hundred! ?
 
Top