Twister_Ken
Well-known member
...back.
On seeing a fully loaded container vessel proceeding the other day it is obvious that it only has restricted fwd visibility because there is a big stack of containers at the front almost as high as the bridge, while the bridge itself is about 7/8th of the way back down the ship. OTOH, liners and warships have the bridge about 1/4 to 1/3rd of the way back from the bow, while some ships have the bridge even further forward.
Why are container ships not built with the bridge further fwd to improve visibility?
<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>
On seeing a fully loaded container vessel proceeding the other day it is obvious that it only has restricted fwd visibility because there is a big stack of containers at the front almost as high as the bridge, while the bridge itself is about 7/8th of the way back down the ship. OTOH, liners and warships have the bridge about 1/4 to 1/3rd of the way back from the bow, while some ships have the bridge even further forward.
Why are container ships not built with the bridge further fwd to improve visibility?
<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>