M
MarkG
Guest
Re: Discuss
Skipper decided to land this way up or else get lost in the sweetcorn...
Skipper decided to land this way up or else get lost in the sweetcorn...
1,000 post threads
- Thread starter Phoenix of Hamble
- Start date
Phoenix of Hamble
Active member
Re: Discuss
Previously a parachutist, and forgot that he didn't need to roll on landing?
Previously a parachutist, and forgot that he didn't need to roll on landing?
Vara
Active member
Re: OK I\'ll do X
Surely these have all to be alliterative,and using joining bits with those little words that start with a different letter should not count.
I would be more specific but I had glandular fever after verbs and have never caught up with the finer points of grammar.
Surely these have all to be alliterative,and using joining bits with those little words that start with a different letter should not count.
I would be more specific but I had glandular fever after verbs and have never caught up with the finer points of grammar.
alistairedw
New member
Re: OK Round 2.
You mean liike this?
Ancient Armenian architects analysing arithmetical anachronisms avidly
You mean liike this?
Ancient Armenian architects analysing arithmetical anachronisms avidly
BlueSkyNick
Active member
--- .... -. --- -. --- - .- -. --- - .... . .-. --- -. . --- ..-. - .... . ... . - .... .-. . .- -.. ... .- --. .- .. -.
BrendanS
Well-known member
I got the ego and other bits, but can't work out what voisinhan means?
fireball
New member
Surely without a more detailed statement I cannot be accused of Lakesailoring?
fireball
New member
[ QUOTE ]
I got the ego
[/ QUOTE ]
Really?
Is that why you tow a tender around with you - to put it in ? /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
I got the ego
[/ QUOTE ]
Really?
Is that why you tow a tender around with you - to put it in ? /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
Phoenix of Hamble
Active member
-.-- . ... .- -. --- - .... . .-. --- -. . --- ..-. - .... . ... . - .... .-. . .- -.. ...
webcraft
Well-known member
Shhh . . . we're painting
- N
- N
fireball
New member
.-- . .-.. .-.. / .-- .... .- - / -.. --- / -.-- --- ..- / . -..- .--. . -.-. -
BrendanS
Well-known member
a tender wouldn't be large enough for my brain, never mind my ego!
fireball
New member
Is that why you don't bother with a liferaft either - not enough room! /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
BrendanS
Well-known member
I'd just jump on the ego. It's big, comfy, and floats.
retriever
New member
I wish I had nothing better to do than witter away endlessly - keep up the good work
Lakesailor
New member
I would have thought tcm's mention of "cretin" would have sealed the fact ages ago.
Please follow the link and read and digest fully. We may be testing later. /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
Please follow the link and read and digest fully. We may be testing later. /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
Stingo
Well-known member
The malt was good and the ice was cold.
As TK would say ' Add nothing to your whiskey but more whiskey'
As TK would say ' Add nothing to your whiskey but more whiskey'
fireball
New member
I refer you to Rule 4 - Lakesailoring Introduction:
[ QUOTE ]
b) “Lakesailoring” rules apply from the moment a second (different) person gives the essentially same answer as an earlier answer in the same thread. With a second similar or identical answer in the thread, the second chronological answer is “a lakesailor”, and that poster is “lakesailoring” the first responder with the same answer. The first responder is “being lakesailored” by the second (and subsequent) responders with that same answer.
[/ QUOTE ]
Due to the fact that my post was a complete restatement of the original post I contest that under rule 4b it is specifically excluded from the term of Lakesailoring.
More over - Rogue Lakesailoring implies a deliberate attempt to Lakesailor thereby discounted by the fact that it was not a Lakesailoring manouever to start with.
I therefore claim that I was mearly restating an original post some 100 or so posts later and as such falls outside the bounds of "Lakesailor rules"
Oh - and I like cretins ... nice crunchy ones on my salad.... /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
[ QUOTE ]
b) “Lakesailoring” rules apply from the moment a second (different) person gives the essentially same answer as an earlier answer in the same thread. With a second similar or identical answer in the thread, the second chronological answer is “a lakesailor”, and that poster is “lakesailoring” the first responder with the same answer. The first responder is “being lakesailored” by the second (and subsequent) responders with that same answer.
[/ QUOTE ]
Due to the fact that my post was a complete restatement of the original post I contest that under rule 4b it is specifically excluded from the term of Lakesailoring.
More over - Rogue Lakesailoring implies a deliberate attempt to Lakesailor thereby discounted by the fact that it was not a Lakesailoring manouever to start with.
I therefore claim that I was mearly restating an original post some 100 or so posts later and as such falls outside the bounds of "Lakesailor rules"
Oh - and I like cretins ... nice crunchy ones on my salad.... /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
rich
Well-known member
ONE more post /forums/images/graemlins/cool.gif
fireball
New member
Which one?