Sixpence
Well-Known Member
You seem to be after the prefects job![]()
More used to waiting for the head master and cane here :encouragement:
You seem to be after the prefects job![]()
Were you the give way vessel? There is nothing in IRPCS which forbids course alterations resulting in a risk of collision, only instructions on what to do after that risk has arisen.[/QUOTE
This cannot be correct. It is prudent for all ships not to take an action that will endanger another vessel.
Rule 2 of Collision Regs
2. Responsibility
(a) Nothing in these Rules shall exonerate any vessel, or the owner, master or crew thereof, from the consequences of any neglect to comply with these Rules or of the neglect of any precaution which may be required by the ordinary practice of seamen, or by the special circumstances of the case
(b) In construing and complying with these rules due regard shall be had to all dangers of navigation and collision and to any special circumstances, including the limitations of the vessels involved, which may make a departure from these rules necessary to avoid immediate danger
[Rule 2 is sometimes referred to as the "General Prudential" rule and provides for non-conformance with stated rules to prevent a collision, because what is paramount is to avoid or minimise the damaging effects of a collision, as opposed to blindly following the rules to the letter. The overall intent is to minimise actual collision taking place rather than rule compliance in and of itself, per se.]
I think we may be a bit optimistic in expecting dinghy sailors to know let alone obey the collision regulations.
Everyone on the water, from kayak to supertanker, should know the "rules of the road'". No excuse for ignorance:
I agree with you, but the kayak paddlers face a big problem.
Were you the give way vessel? There is nothing in IRPCS which forbids course alterations resulting in a risk of collision, only instructions on what to do after that risk has arisen.
This cannot be correct. It is prudent for all ships not to take an action that will endanger another vessel.
A couple of weeks back we overhead a boat on the VHF who was escorting a swimmer from St Malo to Jersey, was that you?
Really, well that rather stuffs the IRPCSs.
No more Ball, Diamond, Ball or fishing baskets/canes in the rigging. Always thought it was a load of balls
Believe it is the responsibility of all skippers to avoid collisions.
That was me and that was the swim I refer to!
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-33846873
Just piloted the first man from Guernsey to Jersey last week as well![]()
I think we may be a bit optimistic in expecting dinghy sailors to know let alone obey the collision regulations.
+1This is getting more like scuttlebutt every day. Can we go back to where we used to be?
What down the bottom of the list as beforeThis is getting more like scuttlebutt every day. Can we go back to where we used to be?
This is getting more like scuttlebutt every day. Can we go back to where we used to be?
What down the bottom of the list as before
+2
Yes
I was motoring, returning to port, tidying up the deck and under auto pilot, when a dinghy came up my stern and told me to get out of the way as he was sailing and I was motoring. He's not the only one, out of a small straw poll of local racers, who thought the same.
+2
Yes