thinwater
Well-Known Member
I think expecting 3-5 metres of rope to absorb the energy of 100m of chain and anchor in free fall is very optimistic. Of course I have never tested this and don't intend to do so in future.
I think the idea of the rope tail is the best solution. Make it long enough so that it reaches on deck and can be cut if want to release the anchor, but my suggestion would be to make this rope weaker than fitting it attached to, so in the worst case the rope snaps rather than ripping out fittings and damaging the structures.
This is no different to driving a car with airbags, it is safety feature that I hope to never use.
The other suggestion is consider using a longer length of floating rope (say 20m) before using a slightly weaker rope as the final attachment point. As an alternative a longer length of conventional rope with a suitable float ready for rapid attachment is a good option. The advantage is if you do need to cut away your anchor (for example if another boat becomes tangled in your rode) the floating rope will act as a marker so the anchor can be retrieved later.
A lot of good points. I can't see my chain lock, windlass, and lashings all going, but I can see that.
I disagree on the amount of rope required. I'm sure any engineer could do a calculation that would show that the terminal velocity of the chain and anchor in free fall is not all that high. This is water, not air. I doubt it ever passes 3 M/s on a recreational yacht, which looks fast, but in reality is not.
I disagree with the idea that the rope should be weak. Make the fittings stronger. But if a boater is unwilling to do that, yes, weak is better. But the bitter end anchor should be able to hold a few tons (perhaps 2-3x the wind load). Enough that if the boat drifts back on it in strong weather it will hold. My anchors would pass that test.