Tonnage tax, light dues and Two Jags …

ParaHandy

Active member
Joined
18 Nov 2001
Messages
5,210
Visit site
As he continually reminds us, two jags is the saviour of the UK marine industry. “UK flagged tonnage triples to 9m tonnes” was his most recent boast. hmmm ….

here’s the MCA CEO a few months earlier launching, again for Hatsu, another ship in Japan. Two jags splashes a bit of credit around “much of this (increase in UK flag) is due to the work of the Maritime & Coastguard Agency, set up in 1998 with the specific objective to increase the number of ships flying the Red Ensign”. Job well done, obviously, and when Storey retired in August last year, he joined the same Taiwanese cpy UK affiliate as Chairman … good luck to him, I say …. And would you believe the name of his successor at the MCA? Capt Bligh … an ex-Nedloyd container ship man … we’re well in there …

the truth is that its nothing to do with the MCA. Hatsu is taking advantage of the optional tonnage tax regime that offers a simpler way of calculating taxable profits. The ‘notional profit’ on either vessel (90,000 tonnes) is about £60k a year or £18k in tax due to the UK. Good, eh? Ah but, Two Jags keeps banging on about how many UK (actually, he means to say EU but forgets) extra jobs are going to be created. Sadly, his own union, the RMT, don’t agree and I suppose they should know. Mere detail … there’s all those strategic and commercial management jobs created for a few like .. erm … retired marine regulators

Anyway, the total UK tax collected from shipping was reckoned to be £20m in 1999 or 1.5% (against 15-30% for other UK corporations) tax rate so all this extra tonnage ought to mean lots of money flowing into UK coffers but at an effective tax rate of £18k for 90,000 tonnes would imply that ol’ Two Jags has to get not 9m but 80m UK flagged tonnes on the register so some other b*ggers will have to pay for the buoys etc that all these ships get the benefit of for free now, virtually … yup, us yins are the mugs ….

I have a thought though that the Light dues crowd could smarten their act up a bit, make the tax a bit more pleasant you know, by sticking a mobile phone in (major) navigational mark with a weather station attached so you could ring the buoy up for current weather conditions? Some lady’s voice such as Kiri Te Banana’s giving the details in an aria format would be nice, don’t you think?



<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Rowana

Two steps lower than the ships' cat
Joined
17 Apr 2002
Messages
6,132
Location
NE Scotland
Visit site
Why are you in "Rant Mode" at 0400??

Hiv ye been havin' a wee swally by ony chunce??

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

tome

New member
Joined
28 Mar 2002
Messages
8,201
Location
kprick
www.google.co.uk
Aha, I see a synergy with my idea to put a coin slot in the buoys. The buoy could lurk below the surface, and a premium rate call would be required to 'activate' the buoy whence it raises to itself to become visible to both eye and radar at a pound a minute. That should please old 'Two Nabs'.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

longjohnsilver

Well-known member
Joined
30 May 2001
Messages
18,841
Visit site
Sleepless night?

No great surprise that this labour lot seem to get it wrong again. Praps I should re-register my business as a ship to get a 1.5% tax rate.

Nice jollies though for 2 jags and ex MCA chairman, it's good to see that the little tax raised on UK shipping is being wisely spent................

Where did you find all this info?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

jimi

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2001
Messages
28,660
Location
St Neots
Visit site
Rumour has it that when 2 jags is retired that he will become the new EC1 buoy, apparently he misheard the offer and is labouring under the delesion that he's going to be the No 1 man in the EC soon .. hope that helps ..

<hr width=100% size=1>I Have The Body Of A God... Buddha
 

gjeffery

New member
Joined
14 Nov 2002
Messages
406
Location
UK Emsworth
Visit site
And me thinking that restrictive practices by the N. U. Seamen in the 1960's and 1970's led to the reduction of the UK fleet.

<hr width=100% size=1>
 

Twister_Ken

Well-known member
Joined
31 May 2001
Messages
27,584
Location
'ang on a mo, I'll just take some bearings
Visit site
Tell me

Where was one J Prescott Esq in the NUS heirachy in the 60's and 70's?

Oh, look what I found on the 10 Downing Street website.

John Prescott was born in Prestatyn, Wales, in 1938. The son of a railway signalman, he was educated at Ellesmere Port Secondary Modern and at 15 began work as a trainee chef. In 1963, after working for ten years as a steward in the Merchant Navy, he gained a diploma in economics and politics at Ruskin College, Oxford, which specialises in courses for union working people. He later went on to gain a BSc in economics and economic history at the University of Hull.

Maritime safety motivated John's decision to work as a full-time official for the National Union of Seamen between 1968 and 1970.


<hr width=100% size=1><A target="_blank" HREF=http://www.writeforweb.com/twister1>Let's Twist Again</A>
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1>Edited by Twister_Ken on 15/04/2004 11:16 (server time).</FONT></P>
 
B

bob_tyler

Guest
Re: Tell me

"Maritime safety motivated John's decision to work as a full-time official for the National Union of Seamen between 1968 and 1970. "

For "maritime safety" substitute "money". Surely nobody else would employ him.


<hr width=100% size=1>
 

ParaHandy

Active member
Joined
18 Nov 2001
Messages
5,210
Visit site
steady on, now, ye'll upset ra parrot ... nivver forget that to enjoy this benign tax regime you'll have to train one out of every 15 employess ... yes, just ONE.. which means the other 14 can be ... well anybody. and, if you can't make even ONE trainee, they'll let you stick a bawbee or two into the Maritime Training Trust.

the single pertinent or relevant requirement on the mca was that their regulatory regime should match continental standards .. wonder what that means?

<hr width=100% size=1>
 
Top