Tidal energy generator experiments in Littlehampton.

jamie N

Well-known member
Joined
20 Dec 2012
Messages
6,274
Location
Fortrose
Visit site
I'd love to see that info on a regional basis. Here 'by Inverness', it's basically a windless day, so not a lot of renewable stuff. Orkney might be different with their current/tidal generators.
As an aside, I see that Scrabster is going to be the support port for a new windfarm in the Pentland Firth. Why wind and not tidal is a mystery to me.
 

lustyd

Well-known member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
12,504
Visit site
If we use more electricity we will possibly use more gas ....
That would depend on the gas. Our data centres now use Hydrogen which is made using excess wind and solar so in theory gas might not always be a bad thing in the future. I can't imagine there's enough production yet but it's early days
 

boomerangben

Well-known member
Joined
24 Jul 2003
Messages
1,234
Location
Isle of Lewis
Visit site
At the start of this, Rotrax mentioned a tidal power generation project and Sarabande mentions it being on one of the fastest flowing rivers. So does a fast flowing river feeding a tidal system benefit or reduce the effectiveness of a tidal power station?

I wonder as we march head long towards electric centric living, how the national grid is coping with distributing all this energy to the users. How is it going to be when everyone starts their hot water heating, car chargers, washing machines, home battery chargers, storage heaters etc the moment the cheaper tariff starts at midnight or whatever. Oh yes, I forgot. The cheaper tariff will disappear. Never mind. It needs to happen but what will be the real cost to the environment.
 

rotrax

Well-known member
Joined
17 Dec 2010
Messages
15,922
Location
South Oxon and Littlehampton.
Visit site
At the start of this, Rotrax mentioned a tidal power generation project and Sarabande mentions it being on one of the fastest flowing rivers. So does a fast flowing river feeding a tidal system benefit or reduce the effectiveness of a tidal power station?

I wonder as we march head long towards electric centric living, how the national grid is coping with distributing all this energy to the users. How is it going to be when everyone starts their hot water heating, car chargers, washing machines, home battery chargers, storage heaters etc the moment the cheaper tariff starts at midnight or whatever. Oh yes, I forgot. The cheaper tariff will disappear. Never mind. It needs to happen but what will be the real cost to the environment.


I have had the opertunity to watch the tides in the estuary from the boat many times.

The river flow is such that until the flood tide reaches a good incoming flow it overcomes the early flood, holding it back.

Then a 'scum line' can be observed making its way up the river, moving steadily and following the course of the deeper channel. Seabirds scavenging on this 'scum line' mark it clearly. It is perhaps one sixth of the width and moves at about a knot. Outside this scum line the river flow is still going out until the flood volume increases, giving a short period of slack water

Shortly after the flood takes over and the tide is ripping in again.

Threequarters of an hour later the same situation occurs at Arundel, the river almost, but not quite overcoming the flood.

It is certainly different to a river with little flow.

On full ebb, it really rips, more than six knots at springs in the narrows.
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
Does history relate whether the 1.2MW tidal turbine in Strangford Lough was considered a success ?

I don't think it was. On the CA forum it was reported that a problem with these situations (middle of strong tidal flow) is that there are lots of eddies and the flow is not parallel so they don't get the full expected benefit. A boat hit the generator, too, so not that safe when plonked in the middle of a channel. I kayaked past it a good few times at springs and the bow wave was magnificent.

Wikipedia (SeaGen - Wikipedia) tells us that it was experimental on a 5 year project, despite being described as commercial. It has now gone.
 

NormanS

Well-known member
Joined
10 Nov 2008
Messages
9,742
Visit site
Using tidal power is hardly a new idea. The town where I live had a "Sea Mill" hundreds of years ago. A tidal lagoon was dammed, and a conventional water wheel in the resultant mill race, was able to work on both the flood and ebb tide. That was long before electricity was discovered of course.
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
Using tidal power is hardly a new idea. The town where I live had a "Sea Mill" hundreds of years ago. A tidal lagoon was dammed, and a conventional water wheel in the resultant mill race, was able to work on both the flood and ebb tide. That was long before electricity was discovered of course.

Yes, direct power but the aim is to transfer that power elsewhere. The nodding ducks I remember from Tomorrow's World seem to have been forgotten, too, but through funding loss: "Salter's duck, also known as the nodding duck or by its official name the Edinburgh duck, is a device that converts wave power into electricity. The wave impact induces rotation of gyroscopes located inside a pear-shaped "duck", and an electrical generator converts this rotation into electricity with an overall efficiency of up to 90%. The Salter's duck was invented by Stephen Salter in response to the oil shortage in the 1970s and was one of the earliest generator designs proposed to the Wave Energy programme in the United Kingdom. The funding for the project was cut off in the early 1980s after oil prices rebounded and the UK government moved away from alternative energy sources. As of May 2018 no wave-power devices have ever gone into large-scale production." Wikipedia.
 

SaltIre

Well-known member
Joined
13 Mar 2017
Messages
21,245
Location
None of your nosey business
Visit site
Thats interesti ng info , thanks

Might mdntion that the Tidal Flow generation goes on each day , twice , and is not dependent upon the wind at all , High Pressure Areas etc etc , it can just go on and on producing each day n night ; Wind Generation cannot , can it ?
Tidal Flow doesn't continue 24x7 day and night. It reduces and stops four times a day then increases again in cyclical fashion - hence the need for storage or tidal generation in other areas with different times for HW & LW.
Maybe some folk who know about boating will be along soon to confirm.;)
 

cpedw

Well-known member
Joined
1 Jun 2001
Messages
1,283
Location
Oban
Visit site
Tidal Flow doesn't continue 24x7 day and night. It reduces and stops four times a day then increases again in cyclical fashion - hence the need for storage or tidal generation in other areas with different times for HW & LW.
Maybe some folk who know about boating will be along soon to confirm.;)
But around UK, the cycle phase changes at different locations. I don't know how the average works out but there is always somewhere that the level is changing. A network of generators connected together (a "grid") might generate continuously.

There were rumours that Salter's duck was scuppered by experts at Harwell who didn't want anything interfering with funding for nuclear energy research.

There was an experimental Trimaran with 4 propellors in the Falls of Lora winter 2017/18. Some of the blades fell off. There was also a report of increased corrosion of nearby mooring chains but that was hard to quantify or even verify.
 
Last edited:

PeterWright

Well-known member
Joined
23 Aug 2006
Messages
1,162
Location
Burnham-on-Crouch, UK
Visit site
Saltire is, of course, quite right and this focuses on one of the common myths surrounding most renewable electricity production schemes. Any generator has an installed capacity i.e. the maximum power it is capable of producing measured in Watts, or more likely Megawatts. A thermal power station will generally operate at an availability of around 85 %, so produce energy of its installed capacity x 0.85 x 8760 (no. of hours in a year) MWh per year. For all sorts of reasons, like sun not shining at night, wind not always blowing, river flow varying with rainfall or amount diverted for irrigation, tidal flow increasing /reducing twice per day, most renewable plant will operate at availabilities more like 25% so, to produce the same amount of energy in a year 3from renewables, 3 or more times the installed capacity of a thermal plant is required.

This is not to say that renewables should not be developed where they give a valuable level of production for the resources employed, but they shuld be assessed on the basis of reasonably expected annual production, rather than installed capacity.

Peter.
 

SaltIre

Well-known member
Joined
13 Mar 2017
Messages
21,245
Location
None of your nosey business
Visit site
Saltire is, of course, quite right and this focuses on one of the common myths surrounding most renewable electricity production schemes. Any generator has an installed capacity i.e. the maximum power it is capable of producing measured in Watts, or more likely Megawatts. A thermal power station will generally operate at an availability of around 85 %, so produce energy of its installed capacity x 0.85 x 8760 (no. of hours in a year) MWh per year. For all sorts of reasons, like sun not shining at night, wind not always blowing, river flow varying with rainfall or amount diverted for irrigation, tidal flow increasing /reducing twice per day, most renewable plant will operate at availabilities more like 25% so, to produce the same amount of energy in a year 3from renewables, 3 or more times the installed capacity of a thermal plant is required.

This is not to say that renewables should not be developed where they give a valuable level of production for the resources employed, but they shuld be assessed on the basis of reasonably expected annual production, rather than installed capacity.

Peter.
I believe the plan for the Orkneys is to crack seawater with excess power and produce hydrogen to fuel their ferries - but my point was more about "lulls" in energy production at the turn of the tide. Another poster mentioned the Sound of Islay, but although the times of High Water are about 6 hours apart that means the turn of the tide is similar...

1640537736637.png 1640537848060.png
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
I believe the plan for the Orkneys is to crack seawater with excess power and produce hydrogen to fuel their ferries - but my point was more about "lulls" in energy production at the turn of the tide. Another poster mentioned the Sound of Islay, but although the times of High Water are about 6 hours apart that means the turn of the tide is similar...
"Why don’t Orcadians like to hear the islands referred to as "the Orkneys"?

In the same way you wouldn’t refer to "the Irelands", "the New Zealands" or "the Hawaiis", Orcadians don't refer to the islands as "the Orkneys". However it is a common mistake made by visitors and the national, and international, media.

It is just "Orkney"."


Having said that, they've had tidal experiments for some years (I have sailed past at least one) but they don't seem to move on commercially. Will it ever work?
 

SaltIre

Well-known member
Joined
13 Mar 2017
Messages
21,245
Location
None of your nosey business
Visit site
Having said that, they've had tidal experiments for some years (I have sailed past at least one) but they don't seem to move on commercially. Will it ever work?
The generator among the Orkney Islands is commercial - not experimental.
The 680-tonne turbine is now anchored in the Fall of Warness where a subsea cable connects the 2MW offshore unit to the local onshore electricity network.
Orbital Marine Power said its first commercial turbine, which will be powered by the fast-flowing waters, is a "major milestone".
It is also providing power to an onshore electrolyser to generate green hydrogen.
'Most powerful' tidal turbine starts generating electricity off Orkney
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
The generator among the Orkney Islands is commercial - not experimental.
The 680-tonne turbine is now anchored in the Fall of Warness where a subsea cable connects the 2MW offshore unit to the local onshore electricity network.

That was where I sailed past, but it must have been a different system about 5 years ago. Unlike seagen this one won't be hit by passing traffic, but looks the same kind of double prop device.
 

dgadee

Well-known member
Joined
13 Oct 2010
Messages
3,986
Visit site
That was where I sailed past, but it must have been a different system about 5 years ago. Unlike seagen this one won't be hit by passing traffic, but looks the same kind of double prop device.

Sorry, bit confused. Does it float? On watching interview it seemed to be undersea, but text says it is on surface.
 
Top