DJE
Well-Known Member
Tall and spectacularly ugly! Presumably the MOD don't need to bother with planning permission.
Yep. All that fuss about wind farms spoiling the view and those things spring up apparently unopposed.
Are they now breeding indiscriminately as I've only seen 2 sets of 3 of those new yellow thingies....what do they signify exactly? Couldn't find a CLEAR answer on QHM website,,,
Yep. All that fuss about wind farms spoiling the view and those things spring up apparently unopposed.
Much better to have multi billion pound aircraft carriers crashing rather than spoiling the view, eh?![]()
Yep. All that fuss about wind farms spoiling the view and those things spring up apparently unopposed.
Well, the "view" they're spoiling is only Portsmouth, so...
Pete
Accepting that they are necessary (there is a whole other thread there!) there seems to have been no thought to aesthetics in the design of the structures. I would expect to see that sort of utilitarian metalwork in an oil refinery or a chemical plant, but right in front of a holiday promenade I'm sure they could have done better. And I have done a fair amount of structural steel design over the years.
First time I Have ever heard "aesthetic" used in a conversation about navigation marks...![]()
To be fair, these are probably the largest navigation marks I've seen short of an actual lighthouse, and there are lots of them.
Still not convinced that anybody goes on holiday to Portsmouth, though
Pete
Accepting that they are necessary (there is a whole other thread there!) ...
That thought crossed my mind as well, but the RN have been known to run into chunks of rock before now.Must admit that it puzzles me why in the 21st century we are building super-carriers that can go anywhere in the world, but can't find their way in and out their home harbour without additional nav aids!
That thought crossed my mind as well, but the RN have been known to run into chunks of rock before now.