TiggerToo
Well-known member
Last edited:
Aren’t you paying for the stability? A stable 7 knots speed under autohelm with no sheet adjustment is worth a lot to some people compared to 7.5 knots with continuous steering and tweaking.For me they are way too pricey. They have less power than a spinnaker. They are easy to set up and fly as you have no pole but when wind is light the same boat with a spinnaker and main set will be a lot faster. I had a quote ten years ago of £8k. We bought a new spinnaker for £2.5k
You can.Is it true that you can fly them without need for a pole? I can't get my head around that claim!
Yours looks great though!
they are fun even for short distances. More than 1hr... go for it. The only "faff" is rigging the various sheets/lazy lines, etc. Just as with a normal spinnaker, but then that is why we go sailing, innit ;-)Agree, they are a fab sail especially for long distance.
pricey. Yes. I got this "preowned". It is now entertaining a new crew (us).For me they are way too pricey. They have less power than a spinnaker. They are easy to set up and fly as you have no pole but when wind is light the same boat with a spinnaker and main set will be a lot faster. I had a quote ten years ago of £8k. We bought a new spinnaker for £2.5k
yes, you can sail dead downwind. Also without a pole, but you need to be at the helm constantly. I have not tried in stronger winds (downwind), as we only cruise for pleasure, and usually very short handed.Aren’t you paying for the stability? A stable 7 knots speed under autohelm with no sheet adjustment is worth a lot to some people compared to 7.5 knots with continuous steering and tweaking.
We have an asymmetric that is very stable under autohelm if the main is down but only to about 150 degrees - more downwind than that and a pole would be needed but a parasail goes a lot deeper I think .
We have friends with the same boat. They have a Parasail. We have an asymmetric spinnaker we set on a pole. Having sailed in company with them, we know how much faster our set up is.pricey. Yes. I got this "preowned". It is now entertaining a new crew (us).
I am not sure about the "less power". Certainly they slam less, and are generally a lot gentler on the boat fittings and the crew.
When the wind is super light day after day as our lat Transat was, having the best speed possible from our spinnaker was very welcome. It's not a race but the difference between moving very slowly or just plane old slowly can be quite significantToo much money for me, but a friend had one that took his Starlight across the Atlantic and thought it was great. Not as fast as a spinnaker? Another matter if you're racing, of course, but I reckon most cruisers would value no faff and decent speed over another half a knot, and constant tweaking.
Besides:
out of curiosity, what version of the Parasailor (I or II) do your mates have? We have an older V.I which (allegedly) is less good at very low wind speeds. I'd be curious to hear from "real people" in "real waters", as it were.When the wind is super light day after day as our lat Transat was, having the best speed possible from our spinnaker was very welcome. It's not a race but the difference between moving very slowly or just plane old slowly can be quite significant
pricey. Yes. I got this "preowned". It is now entertaining a new crew (us).
There were a couple for sale in Rodney Bay after the ARC I was on. Not sure whether it was a case of job done, don’t need it any more or they weren’t liked.Good for you. I think they look brilliant.
I’m keeping half an eye open for a second hand one, as I don’t think I could bring myself to pay the full price on a sail I’d only use occasionally.
When sailed in company with them it was 2014 so an early one I guess. They took to flying theirs on a pole like a spinnaker with the main up to get more speed from it. They crossed the Pacific mainly using it like that.out of curiosity, what version of the Parasailor (I or II) do your mates have? We have an older V.I which (allegedly) is less good at very low wind speeds. I'd be curious to hear from "real people" in "real waters", as it were.
out of curiosity, what version of the Parasailor (I or II) do your mates have?
You do need a pole on a monohull deep down wind if you are flying the main otherwise you blanket the sail. I can't get my head around the whole thing. I didn't buy a sailing boat for an easy life. If I want an easy life crossing the pond I would take a jet.The year they launched the new version, the istec sales guy at boot was telling me how the v1 was rubbish compared with the new version. I suspect this was not entirely unrelated to the fact that my question had been why their sail was worth the extra over the ones from oxley which I understand are variants of their v1, the patent on which had just expired. There had been no mention of suboptimal design when the uk distributors had tried to flog my mate the v1 at Southampton 4 months prior (which he would have done had they not denied offering him the deal they had done (I was standing next to him when they made him the offer) when he called to order one) and they were still selling the v1 (rebranded “classic” iirc) alongside the v2.
Anyone got one of the cheaper oxley ones?
Being happy to sacrifice speed for an easy life I’m drawn to the concept of these. I recall threads on cruisersforum suggesting that deeper downwind you needed a pole on a monohull but posts here seem to be saying otherwise.