MOBY2
Member
Like Rebbecca too
Universal cause if strife !!Totally subjective as I said. There is no contest about what is 'allowed'. It's simply that not everyone has the same opinion. Which is good, surely?
I wonder if the rule of thumb for running costs (10% of the value of the boat per year) still applies when the value is in the tens of millions.I remember some yesrs ago a friend of mine bought a BMW but could not afford the fuel for it !! But with a boat like that if you can affird to buy it then maintaining it will not be a problem
If I were buying a boat like that, that's exactly the way I'd maintain it. Lying in a soggy bilge trying to undo a seized bolt is an over-rated experience, IMOusing " experts / specialists " do do all the work , like fibreglass repairs, mechanics for the engines, riggers for the rigging , leckys for the electrics etc etc
" soggy bilge " , " seized bolt ",,,, are we talking about the same beast here ?If I were buying a boat like that, that's exactly the way I'd maintain it. Lying in a soggy bilge trying to undo a seized bolt is an over-rated experience, IMO
It's only a rule of thumb - bound to miles out for many. I'm sure I first saw it on here. But its not far off for me including mooring cost, all the usual outgoings and occasional upgrades - new sails, etc.how do you calculate that 10 % ,, is that with using " experts / specialists " do do all the work , like fibreglass repairs, mechanics for the engines, riggers for the rigging , leckys for the electrics etc etc , or as in doing ones own maintinence etc ,, i know i certainly have not spent 10% of my boat value this year , including marina fees ( which are the main exp ) materials etc , but would have been more than the 10% if i had hired it all out .
Good point, but I'd still have someone else do the spannering." soggy bilge " , " seized bolt ",,,, are we talking about the same beast here ?