Little Ricky
Well-Known Member
Im sure I met her at a flat earth convention...lovely girl.Yes please
View attachment 206389
Im sure I met her at a flat earth convention...lovely girl.Yes please
View attachment 206389
Lovely looking boats with flybridges, are always ruined in their style by silly pointless hard tops. Their function is merely to keep the sun off people's delicate heads, well in the words of Blackadder, "perhaps some sort of hat is in order".
I'm intrigued. If, as you believe, they are pointless, why, in your opinion, are so very many people paying a substantial amount of money to specify them on their boats?
Many reasons. 1, the boat already comes with it so they've no choice, 2 the salesman talks them in speccing it because it will "harm resale" 3 they're afraid to do something different, and 4 people dont care about the design of the boat as much as the consequences of not having a hard top.I'm intrigued. If, as you believe, they are pointless, why, in your opinion, are so very many people paying a substantial amount of money to specify them on their boats?![]()
Yes.. I can't give an absolute answer but just because they are frequently specced by buyers doesn't automatically indicate that the boat is better for it. Bayesian sailing superyacht had at the time of build, the highest mast available. Was it functionally the best option? No. It was to be the tallest.If you look at an image on your computer of any modern flybridge that is over 55 feet that has a hard top, Azimut 55, Princess 60 just examples, put your hand over the flybridge part so whats underneath is whats left, see how much more attractive and in keeping with the design style of the rest of the boat that looks.
Correct. How does that make them 'pointless'?If you look at an image on your computer of any modern flybridge that is over 55 feet that has a hard top, Azimut 55, Princess 60 just examples, put your hand over the flybridge part so whats underneath is whats left, see how much more attractive and in keeping with the design style of the rest of the boat that looks.
I'm guessing that's your Trader in your Avatar, with a hard top..?Yes.. I can't give an absolute answer but just because they are frequently specced by buyers doesn't automatically indicate that the boat is better for it. Bayesian sailing superyacht had at the time of build, the highest mast available. Was it functionally the best option? No. It was to be the tallest.
Yachting, especially as it gets expensive, is very image driven. I wouldn't doubt many hard tops are specified because other similar boats in the marina have one, so you can't be the 'guy' who specs their new fancy schmancy yacht with an old school open deck or 'heaven forbid' a piece of rag protecting your head from the sun... What would the neighbours say??
You do appear to have a bee in your hardtop about thisIf you look at an image on your computer of any modern flybridge that is over 55 feet that has a hard top, Azimut 55, Princess 60 just examples, put your hand over the flybridge part so whats underneath is whats left, see how much more attractive and in keeping with the design style of the rest of the boat that looks.
That's a hard top on the rear deck. The flybridge is all uncovered for my shiny head to see the sun as per my post #20. Roof over rear deck, flybridge open unless I put a bimini raggy thing up.I'm guessing that's your Trader in your Avatar, with a hard top..?
Is it there just because everyone else has one?![]()
So it's just there because everyone else has one? What about the Bayesian?That's a hard top on the rear deck. The flybridge is all uncovered for my shiny head to see the sun as per my post #20. Roof over rear deck, flybridge open unless I put a bimini raggy thing up.
What are you going on about? The point being discussed was hardtops on flybridges, as per the original picture of the Swift Trawler 54, which mine still doesn't have. Clear?So it's just there because everyone else has one?
You were making baseless judgements about people choosing hardtops purely for reasons of image and making bizarre comparisons with the Bayesian. I'm simply doing the same about your hardtop. Clear?What are you going on about? The point being discussed was hardtops on flybridges, as per the original picture of the Swift Trawler 54, which mine still doesn't have. Clear?
Nope.You were making baseless judgements about people choosing hardtops purely for reasons of image and making bizarre comparisons with the Bayesian. I'm simply doing the same about your hardtop. Clear?
Yup, absolutely. The majority of experienced owners in the Med, Florida etc will spec them. Much less necessary in the UK as you say, sadly.The Hard top that was fitted to this particular boat looked completely okay to me, very much in keeping with the styling, whilst unlikely to be necessary in the UK of course. Probably an essential fixture in the Mediterranean.
My friend has a smaller '35 and whilst pretty new it looks an efficient interior but I do wonder what the lifespan of the interior materials are. They're much closer to a half decent new domestic kitchen than joinery of old. Not passing judgement either way, as I've not seen onboard any old enough yet.Interesting comment re quality of fit out as that was a thought I had looking at older Trawlers but I haven’t had a chance to view in the flesh an early 41 type . I guess you cannot expect the same quality as a nordhaven or broom etc but I did wonder what say a2020 boat would look like in 5 years time internally. There have been some earlier ones for sale eg a44 recently sold I saw
A little bit of a thread dig up here but regarding quality, notably the interior fit-outs and Nordhavns. I was watching the Awanui NZ channel with their N51 and the engineering has some excellent features etc but it appears the panelling quality looked a lot more inline with say a Swift Trawler than traditional high end joinery.I guess you cannot expect the same quality as a nordhaven or broom etc