179580
Well-Known Member
Absolutely spot on, with the help also of wikipedia which endorses everything you quote I have now an understanding. you certainly know the subject.Generally, an indirect injection diesel will need to be preheated, a direct injection won't. Yes there will be exceptions, but an indirect injection diesel has a greater surface area that will initially absorb the heat generated by compression, a direct injection's combustion chamber is partly on top of the piston and doesn't have a pre combustion chamber's surface area. Most cars up to the late 90s had the indirect design due to it being quieter with less diesel knock and they had glow plugs fitted that protruded into the precombustion chamber. An exception being the Austin Rover diesel, hence the noise it made. Commercial vehicles didn't need to be as refined or quiet so it was acceptable for those to be fitted with direct injection diesels with the diesel being injected directly on top of the piston.
Then came common rail with electronic high pressure injectors in the late 90s. They are all direct injection but could be made more refined and quiet by the use of electronics with the injector firing numerous times per stroke. Most don't need glow plugs for starting (Mercedes for example is an exception) but use the glow plugs to reduce emissions during cold running and at different times throughout a journey. They may only need glow plugs for starting if the temperature was well below zero.
Your older pre 2000 transit was direct injection, your Peugeot xud was indirect. The volvo 200x range is direct, whereas Betas for example are indirect.
If an engine could do without any preheat it wasn't fitted such as the old Transit.
The indirect injection was quieter, more refined but at the expense of fuel efficiency. Hope this generalisation helps.
