Save our Waterways - The government response

jaws

Member
Joined
27 Apr 2003
Messages
318
Visit site
Absolutely BS response and no mention of the EA. http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page11521.asp

[ QUOTE ]
Over the past ten years British Waterways has been enormously successful in the management of its waterways and the Government is committed to ensuring it is able to continue to do so. In just the past seven years, British Waterways has facilitated the restoration of more than 200 miles of canals and waterways and reduced its maintenance backlog under this £180 million programme. This has only been possible because of substantial government investment by Government in England, Wales and Scotland of £524 million since 2000. British Waterways is a good example of where the Government's increased investment should be viewed against performance over the last 10 years and not just on the basis of a short term adjustment.

Ten years ago, the total revenue figure, on a like-for-like basis, was £98.7 million; this year, it is £189.4 million. Over the past six years in England and Wales British Waterways has received £452 million, and its waterways in Scotland have received some £72 million from the Scottish Executive giving a total Government spend on £524 million. This includes £42 million between 1999 and 2004 - which helped British Waterways clear its £90 million backlog of safety arrears. It did this eight months ahead of target.

Last year, British Waterways earned just short of £100m in trading income, the highest it has ever earned and making up over half of its total income of £190m - its fourth best year ever in terms of overall revenue. The rest of its income comes from Government grant and third party contributions. British Waterways agrees that in the long term, it needs to become more self-sufficient, so that it can reduce its reliance on money from central Government. In light of this, the restructuring of British Waterways was already in progress before the budget realignments were announced.

It is for the Board of British Waterways to decide how best to apportion its reduced budget in relation to its activities and I very much welcome the way it is taking positive action to actively manage its own funding situation and put itself on a firm footing to ensure the sustainability of its canals for the future.

Over the course of last summer and autumn, Ministers reviewed Defra's budgets. The Chief Executives and Chairman of British Waterways, along with others in the Defra family of sponsored bodies, were invited to contribute to this process.

British Waterways' grant for 2007/08 remains at just over £55m. It has also received £2.048m for the repayment of the principal on a National Loans Fund loan, bringing its total budget for 2007/08 to £57.545m. In arriving at this figure, Ministers have sought to provide an affordable level of cover, avoiding the need to make a cash cut to funding, given that other budgets within core Defra have been cut.

I am pleased that we have been able to safeguard this level of funding, given spending constraints. British Waterways needs greater certainty of funding if it is to be able to plan sensibly and run its business. This is why we notified it of its funding for 2007/08 before Christmas in order to help it manage the consequences and any risks associated with this level of funding. It is now the Government's intention to provide British Waterways with greater security of funding, through a three-year funding agreement, from 2008/09.

[/ QUOTE ]
 

Brayman

Active member
Joined
27 Nov 2006
Messages
3,040
Location
Wimborne, Dorset
Visit site
Well aren't they proud of themselves. Maybe they don't realise they are resonsible for the Environment Agency as well. How can they possibly NOT make any reference to the EA?
 

Chris_d

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2001
Messages
4,677
Location
Oxfordshire
Visit site
Well best we shut up then, seems BW have loads of money afterall, I guess this bit refers to the EA:

"Over the course of last summer and autumn, Ministers reviewed Defra's budgets. The Chief Executives and Chairman of British Waterways, along with OTHERS in the Defra family of sponsored bodies, were invited to contribute to this process."
 

Ramage

Active member
Joined
9 Jul 2006
Messages
2,467
Location
Hampton Hill
Visit site
"agrees that in the long term, it needs to become more self-sufficient"

How to make money... Hmmm Gatsos on the bank?

Or perhaps we will just time them between locks and get Lock-keepers to collect the fines.

I hope they are not reading this.... /forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
27,543
Location
Medway
Visit site
Blooming heck you are a grumpy lot up there on the Thames.
The upper Medway is getting more money spent on it in the very near future than has been spent on it in a very long time.
They have actually been clearing crap out of the river above Snodland and joy of joys the gates are being motorised at Alllington lock.
3 new sets of overnight moorings are on the slate at three of the locks above Yalding.Only recently the EA moorings at Yalding were completely rebuilt with proper oak sheeting and good quality bollards.Several lock gates are due for replacement and the poo pump out is being upgraded along the river.We even had a nice new lifting bridge beside the Anchor pub,OK so it would not work properly for several months,but its the thought that counts.
Ps The little dredger thing has finally giving up the ghost and has got to be replaced.
 

Nauti Fox

Well-known member
Joined
28 Oct 2003
Messages
10,601
Location
Kent
Ducatiproteam.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
They have actually been clearing crap out of the river above Snodland

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh no, no more free wheely bins or tyres for the car, and just where are we meant to get the next settee from?
 

Andrew_Fanner

New member
Joined
13 Mar 2002
Messages
8,514
Location
ked into poverty by children
Visit site
>>>
We even had a nice new lifting bridge beside the Anchor pub,OK so it would not work properly for several months,but its the thought that counts.
>>>
Same key? Shelled out for a key in 2005 and it didn't work as the bridge was FUBAR, Allington locky didn't want it back. Still got the key if anyone wants it.
 

DogsBody

Active member
Joined
19 Feb 2003
Messages
797
Location
Thames
Visit site
Re: Medway spending

Well at least we know where all our extra license money is going now then. /forums/images/graemlins/wink.gif
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
27,543
Location
Medway
Visit site
Yes same key,sorry about nicking all the funds.
Will be going up river in next weekend or two so will see if clearing of rubbish has had any difference what so ever
Unit18 will just have to get his soft furnishings elsewhere.
Just to show there are no hard feelings please feel free to enjoy this picture of "our" new bridge.
bridge.jpg

And before anyone comments that is SWMBO operating the controls..............and yes that is the Medway in all its untamed glory underneath.
 

Andrew_Fanner

New member
Joined
13 Mar 2002
Messages
8,514
Location
ked into poverty by children
Visit site
Always a favourite place when I was a child. A good solid bicycle ride from home and always some form of activity to watch, often Mirror dinghy racing in the river bit below the stone bridge.

I'm sure the beer used to be better than it was a bit back too:)

I don't fret about the Medway getting some work done, it was my "home" river for 25 years andf I've swum in it, rubber rafted on it, sculled on it, rowed on it, sailed on it and even cruised in motor boats at up to [deleted] knots. If wanted there is a good aerial photo of the Tonbridge wharf area when it was still just a working environment in the late 1960s that I could find, scan up and post for interested parties.
 

oldgit

Well-known member
Joined
6 Nov 2001
Messages
27,543
Location
Medway
Visit site
Wonder if you remember the "lifeguards" that used to be there on summer weekends.Location was tiny riverbank campsite just across road, access down narrow path opposite that bridge.This would have been around early 1970s.
Memory suggests most of the time was spent in the "Anchor" and another pub nearbye called The Red house" ????
 
Top