MapisM
Well-Known Member
Easy, you buy another one.What happens if it conks out over the water? Doesn't look like it will float that well!
Dunno if they sell it without the remote, if they do you might save a few quids! :nonchalance:
Easy, you buy another one.What happens if it conks out over the water? Doesn't look like it will float that well!
You can buy filters specially for the dji phantom cameraFunny you should mention it, because I asked scubaman if he had one, and not only he didn't, but he told me that you can't fit any screw-on filter on the camera.
Then again, a polarising filter wouldn't make a lot of sense anyway, if you think about it: the reflection angle is constantly changing while the copter moves around, and you can't just rotate the filter by hand as you do with your camera, for very obvious reasons...![]()
What happens if it conks out over the water? Doesn't look like it will float that well!
You can buy filters specially for the dji phantom camera
I'm going to try a polariser but I agree your concern. Also I'm worried it will spoil the nice shots where you get twinkly reflected sunlight on the wavelet tops, eg 0-3 and 25-40 of the vid below. But I'll give it a try
It's 2.4 - much better for dealing with obstacles than 5.0 The video is streamed from the drone to your iPad in a lower resolution than the camera is recording at, so you rarely run out of bandwidth
In theory, it could memorize the path already followed, and recalculate a safe return path on that basis.I haven't looked into yet is how it does the trip back home
Sorry for the delay. Nothing more to add really but just the notion of how well it worked when shooting the second vid (of Mezzaluna caves). The drone was pretty far away and out of sight, well below the horizon, as I was standing on top of the cliffs. At some point I got a message warning me of reduced image quality and that's when I decided not to head further in the fear of losing it.
I know it has a 'return home' -functionality if the contact is lost but what I haven't looked into yet is how it does the trip back home. In this case anything other than a direct ascend before heading back to base would have resulted in a crash to the side of the cliff.
Read my second sentence :encouragement:Thanks Jfm, but "flies to a user defined height" relative to the take off position ground level, or current position based on radio/laser/gps altimeter altitude?
Read my second sentence :encouragement: