RNLI age rant

mbay

New member
Joined
3 Jun 2003
Messages
457
Location
North East England
Visit site
So I was having a brew with my neighbour the other day (mooring not house) and we got chatting about the RNLI of which he has a lot to do with in my local area, he his some kind of leader or god type person within the organisation his exact title escapes me.
Anyway I was showing a vague interest in maybe joining and helping out after all I’m an ex-lifeguard I know my way round boats and have done first aid etc.

How old are you he asks, 47 i reply oh your to old 45 is the age limit.................. WHAT!!!!! HOW THE ***** THAT.......was my somewhat unbelievable cry. Oh its a young mans game jumping around in rough seas on little boats, you need to be fit, strong and supple.

Now I’m not that bothered about being unable to join the RNLI it was only a vague interest anyway, but I am a bit pissed off to think that a large organisation thinks’ I’m over the hill at 45, sorry 47 when i know i can probably outswim, out run, out bike, out chin and out dip the entire crew even if they are all younger than me.

What say the rest of you old over 45 people?
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,138
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
A physical test instead of ageism would be better - Some even grow wiser with age, so would be better personnel.

Without a physical test it IS ageism - and could be challenged under age discrimintaion legislation, if anyone felt strongly enough about it. It would certainly be an interesting test case!

That said, other service organizations (armed forces, the police and fire service come to mind) have low retiring ages for staff who have not achieved promotion to a point where it is presumed they will not be engaged in active service.
 

Sniper

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2001
Messages
857
Location
East Coast
Visit site
As a paramedic who, under the latest pensions review, is now required to work to 65, I think a 45 year old cut off is a bit of a joke (although obviously a slightly different situation as the RNLI are all volunteers)
 

mbay

New member
Joined
3 Jun 2003
Messages
457
Location
North East England
Visit site
Without a physical test it IS ageism - and could be challenged under age discrimintaion legislation, if anyone felt strongly enough about it. It would certainly be an interesting test case!

That said, other service organizations (armed forces, the police and fire service come to mind) have low retiring ages for staff who have not achieved promotion to a point where it is presumed they will not be engaged in active service.

yes but don't they all have some sort or fitness test to get in? does the RNLI? i doubt it.
 

SolentBoat

New member
Joined
7 Jan 2010
Messages
159
Visit site
Many, many years ago, when still a teenager, I used to crew on an RNLI RIB. I remember doing exercises with (IIRC) Arun class boats and we'd swap crews for a while. The older Arun class blokes almost always concluded that ours was a "young man's game". I used to wonder what they were talking about. But now I'm well into my 40s, I think they may have had a point - I'm not sure I'd be up to the sheer physicality of working on those small boats these days. If there's any sea running then even getting to the casulty would be knackering - though they probably don't do beach launches anymore - and you're fully exposed to the elements. Certainly for the small boats, I'd say you've got to be both bloody fit and have the stamina that only comes with the mental stubbornness of youth!
 

mikefleetwood

Well-known member
Joined
19 Dec 2005
Messages
3,670
Location
In my shed
Visit site
I think you will find that the paid crew - coxswain, mechanic - retire at 55. Probably expected that volunteer crew do the same. Inconsideration of the required investment in training, the RNLI probably consider a usable working life of only 7-8 years a poor return.

All-weather lifeboat crew IS a young man's game. I don't think there's anyone on our local crew much over 40. It is much more physically demanding than any kind of leisure boating (with the possible exception of trans-ocean racing). frequently called out in conditions no leisure sailor would choose to venture into.

No age limit for shore crew, though.
 

mbay

New member
Joined
3 Jun 2003
Messages
457
Location
North East England
Visit site
All-weather lifeboat crew IS a young man's game. I don't think there's anyone on our local crew much over 40

so they do fitness tests for the under 40's do they? because i know a lot of over 40's that could put a lot of under 40's to shame, surely if your strong enough and fit enough to carry out a job your good enough! why does age have to come into it unless your a professional athlete or such.
 

photodog

Lord High Commander of Upper Broughton and Gunthor
Joined
8 Apr 2007
Messages
38,380
Visit site
You can join the Canadian army as old as 57. There are fitness requirments of course.
 

sailorman

Well-known member
Joined
21 May 2003
Messages
78,864
Location
Here or thertemp ashore
Visit site
So I was having a brew with my neighbour the other day (mooring not house) and we got chatting about the RNLI of which he has a lot to do with in my local area, he his some kind of leader or god type person within the organisation his exact title escapes me.
Anyway I was showing a vague interest in maybe joining and helping out after all I’m an ex-lifeguard I know my way round boats and have done first aid etc.

How old are you he asks, 47 i reply oh your to old 45 is the age limit.................. WHAT!!!!! HOW THE ***** THAT.......was my somewhat unbelievable cry. Oh its a young mans game jumping around in rough seas on little boats, you need to be fit, strong and supple.

Now I’m not that bothered about being unable to join the RNLI it was only a vague interest anyway, but I am a bit pissed off to think that a large organisation thinks’ I’m over the hill at 45, sorry 47 when i know i can probably outswim, out run, out bike, out chin and out dip the entire crew even if they are all younger than me.

What say the rest of you old over 45 people?

That would rule out Henry Blogg then
 

maxi77

Active member
Joined
11 Nov 2007
Messages
6,084
Location
Kingdom of Fife
Visit site
I questioned a retired coxswain about this many years ago and he told me it was because the risk of serious back injury when bouncing from wave top to wave top increases to what they feel is an unacceptable level beyond that age
 

nortada

Well-known member
Joined
24 May 2012
Messages
15,410
Location
Walton-on-the-Naze.
Visit site
I questioned a retired coxswain about this many years ago and he told me it was because the risk of serious back injury when bouncing from wave top to wave top increases to what they feel is an unacceptable level beyond that age

Sounds reasonable.

I have been led to believe that this same bouncing can lead to detached retinas in older folk so yes it is a younger persons' sport.
 

Juan Twothree

Well-known member
Joined
24 Aug 2010
Messages
757
Visit site
To clear up a few points that have been raised earlier in this thread:

The age limit mentioned, 45, (with an option to extend service to 55, recently increased from 50) only applies to inshore lifeboats i.e. inflatables/Atlantic RHIBs

I believe the retirement age for volunteers on all-weather lifeboats is 60, but I may be wrong (I'm ILB crew).

All lifeboat crew have to undertake a regular fitness test, regardless of age. The current ILB one includes step, lifting and grip tests, plus reboarding the lifeboat from the water (which isn't as easy as some on here think it is, even on a RHIB).

As someone else has mentioned, the reason for the apparently low retirement age is mainly due to the increased risk of back injury. Although the more recent versions of the Atlantic ILB have a gentler ride than what went previously, it still bl**dy hurts sometimes when you land off a big wave. And that can go on for several hours during a long search.

Is it a young man's boat? Well, I'm nearly 50, and have been crewing for well over 20 years. I'm very fit, running and/or cycling every day, but even so I ache a bit the day after a bouncy trip in the boat, in a way that I didn't when I was in my twenties or thirties.

Hopefully I'll be able to carry on till 55, but if it gets too much I'll have to be realistic and call it a day.


And yes, I know Henry Blogg carried on till he was 70, but his lifeboat only did about 8 knots!
 

Sniper

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2001
Messages
857
Location
East Coast
Visit site
To clear up a few points that have been raised earlier in this thread:

The age limit mentioned, 45, (with an option to extend service to 55, recently increased from 50) only applies to inshore lifeboats i.e. inflatables/Atlantic RHIBs

I believe the retirement age for volunteers on all-weather lifeboats is 60, but I may be wrong (I'm ILB crew).

All lifeboat crew have to undertake a regular fitness test, regardless of age. The current ILB one includes step, lifting and grip tests, plus reboarding the lifeboat from the water (which isn't as easy as some on here think it is, even on a RHIB).

As someone else has mentioned, the reason for the apparently low retirement age is mainly due to the increased risk of back injury. Although the more recent versions of the Atlantic ILB have a gentler ride than what went previously, it still bl**dy hurts sometimes when you land off a big wave. And that can go on for several hours during a long search.

Is it a young man's boat? Well, I'm nearly 50, and have been crewing for well over 20 years. I'm very fit, running and/or cycling every day, but even so I ache a bit the day after a bouncy trip in the boat, in a way that I didn't when I was in my twenties or thirties.

Hopefully I'll be able to carry on till 55, but if it gets too much I'll have to be realistic and call it a day.


And yes, I know Henry Blogg carried on till he was 70, but his lifeboat only did about 8 knots!

That sounds like a much more sensible rendition of a policy. Backs do wear out and any heavy pounding or lifting after the age of 55 is not a good idea. Pity the government don't take the same view.
 

Biggles Wader

Well-known member
Joined
3 Mar 2013
Messages
10,809
Location
London
Visit site
I obviously don't know what you do for a living pal, but if your world can be any more real than mine I'd like to know about it.

Touche.I know exactly where you are coming from but regret to inform you 65 is optimistic.Your retirement age will be 66 or higher depending on your current age.
The comparison with the RNLI is interesting.They go out and work hard a few times a week,but you go out seven or eight times a shift.How many years can you realistically keep that up?Good luck with it anyway
 
Top