"Rip off" Britain again

Daydream believer

Well-known member
Joined
6 Oct 2012
Messages
19,836
Location
Southminster, essex
Visit site
I am not biased. I am only stating the fact that I am now being charged more. How is that biased. What about if you tell me what has changed to make the companies costs higher and increase my charges. Apart from brexit, the law and therefore the ability for them to be greedier, that is.

Why must people always refer to profits as " greed". The companies are NOT being greedy at all. They are making efficient use of the rule changes bought about by the new legislation.. If that makes them more profit, then one might ask why they are not entitled to do so. Companies are generally formed for the benefit of the shareholders. Those shareholders are looking for returns on their investments & expect good returns,
I imagine that many forumites here have investments in- for example- share isas. They expect those isas to make a good return year on year. Some of them may have shares in telecoms. ( indirectly). Are you suggesting that they are greedy for looking to invest in the equities etc with the best returns. Because it works in more ways than one. If you want your investments to rise you cannot complain if the companies you invest in push for max profits.
 

roblpm

Well-known member
Joined
30 Mar 2012
Messages
7,299
Visit site
Why must people always refer to profits as " greed". The companies are NOT being greedy at all. They are making efficient use of the rule changes bought about by the new legislation.. If that makes them more profit, then one might ask why they are not entitled to do so. Companies are generally formed for the benefit of the shareholders. Those shareholders are looking for returns on their investments & expect good returns,
I imagine that many forumites here have investments in- for example- share isas. They expect those isas to make a good return year on year. Some of them may have shares in telecoms. ( indirectly). Are you suggesting that they are greedy for looking to invest in the equities etc with the best returns. Because it works in more ways than one. If you want your investments to rise you cannot complain if the companies you invest in push for max profits.
Of course. Corporations are designed to be only in the interests of their shareholders. That's why we have regulation. Its the balance between profits and social good that is the choice. It is just a choice. The nordic countries make one choice. USA and increasingly UK make a different choice.
 

DFL1010

Active member
Joined
7 Sep 2011
Messages
451
Visit site
Of course. Corporations are designed to be only in the interests of their shareholders. That's why we have regulation. Its the balance between profits and social good that is the choice. It is just a choice. The nordic countries make one choice. USA and increasingly UK make a different choice.

That's why it's so handy that Brits have the option to easily move to, and live in, other EU countries which have made a different choice that one prefers.

Oh wait hang on a sec...
 

greeny

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2004
Messages
2,200
Location
Portugal
Visit site
Why must people always refer to profits as " greed". The companies are NOT being greedy at all. They are making efficient use of the rule changes bought about by the new legislation.. If that makes them more profit, then one might ask why they are not entitled to do so. Companies are generally formed for the benefit of the shareholders. Those shareholders are looking for returns on their investments & expect good returns,
I imagine that many forumites here have investments in- for example- share isas. They expect those isas to make a good return year on year. Some of them may have shares in telecoms. ( indirectly). Are you suggesting that they are greedy for looking to invest in the equities etc with the best returns. Because it works in more ways than one. If you want your investments to rise you cannot complain if the companies you invest in push for max profits.
That's your take on it but not the way I see it. I see it as a rip off!
 

Stemar

Well-known member
Joined
12 Sep 2001
Messages
22,949
Location
Home - Southampton, Boat - Gosport
Visit site
I get that shareholders want profits; however, without customers, there are no profits, and that seems to be something that shareholders and directors often forget. Piss off the customers and there'll be no shares to hold or business to direct - or pay out those bonuses.

I'd like to be a socialist but, looking around, I don't see any purely socialist governments that work. Equality is great, but there are always some who are more equal than others and, TBH, why should I do more than the absolute minimum if it doesn't make me a bit more equal than the one who does nothing? So, I'm a capitalist - up to a point. Profits make wealth and, as long as the wealth is fairly distributed, I've no problem with that, but first define fair! Good managers are rare beasts, those who can manage big workforces and big money, rarer still, so they should be paid more than the bloke who pushes a broom, but finding the balance is the trick. Paying the ones on the bottom of the pile a living wage and paying those on the top enough to motivate them is a delicate balancing act, and what seems to be the current trend of zero hours contracts at the bottom and multi-million bonuses at the top just ain't it. Nor is gouging the customer just because you can.
 

greeny

Well-known member
Joined
15 Jun 2004
Messages
2,200
Location
Portugal
Visit site
There is a LOT of choice so nothing to stop you shopping around.There are alway deals to be had.
If you do not like the choice, you can always use 2 coke tins & a bit of string. ( actually just as good in my area ) :rolleyes:

is all down to the fact that my wife does not understand me !!

Neither do I. :)
 
Top