lustyd
Well-known member
It's certainly not the island you left, and not just due to that word.
I am not biased. I am only stating the fact that I am now being charged more. How is that biased. What about if you tell me what has changed to make the companies costs higher and increase my charges. Apart from brexit, the law and therefore the ability for them to be greedier, that is.
In seven weeks? Or since 1979! ?It's certainly not the island you left, and not just due to that word.
Of course. Corporations are designed to be only in the interests of their shareholders. That's why we have regulation. Its the balance between profits and social good that is the choice. It is just a choice. The nordic countries make one choice. USA and increasingly UK make a different choice.Why must people always refer to profits as " greed". The companies are NOT being greedy at all. They are making efficient use of the rule changes bought about by the new legislation.. If that makes them more profit, then one might ask why they are not entitled to do so. Companies are generally formed for the benefit of the shareholders. Those shareholders are looking for returns on their investments & expect good returns,
I imagine that many forumites here have investments in- for example- share isas. They expect those isas to make a good return year on year. Some of them may have shares in telecoms. ( indirectly). Are you suggesting that they are greedy for looking to invest in the equities etc with the best returns. Because it works in more ways than one. If you want your investments to rise you cannot complain if the companies you invest in push for max profits.
Of course. Corporations are designed to be only in the interests of their shareholders. That's why we have regulation. Its the balance between profits and social good that is the choice. It is just a choice. The nordic countries make one choice. USA and increasingly UK make a different choice.
That's your take on it but not the way I see it. I see it as a rip off!Why must people always refer to profits as " greed". The companies are NOT being greedy at all. They are making efficient use of the rule changes bought about by the new legislation.. If that makes them more profit, then one might ask why they are not entitled to do so. Companies are generally formed for the benefit of the shareholders. Those shareholders are looking for returns on their investments & expect good returns,
I imagine that many forumites here have investments in- for example- share isas. They expect those isas to make a good return year on year. Some of them may have shares in telecoms. ( indirectly). Are you suggesting that they are greedy for looking to invest in the equities etc with the best returns. Because it works in more ways than one. If you want your investments to rise you cannot complain if the companies you invest in push for max profits.
There is a LOT of choice so nothing to stop you shopping around.There are alway deals to be had.That's your take on it but not the way I see it. I see it as a rip off!
There is a LOT of choice so nothing to stop you shopping around.There are alway deals to be had.
If you do not like the choice, you can always use 2 coke tins & a bit of string. ( actually just as good in my area )![]()
Not a very inventive child thenis all down to the fact that my wife does not understand me !!
Neither do I.![]()
Try that one with a TV license, your still paying for when it's off?So can I expect a reduction in the phone bill,now I am not paying for a service I did not use?