Righting A Yacht That Has Gone Over!

Once dried out I added a 100kg lead bulb to the keel to prevent a similar occurence.

Was there much involved in designing and fitting the lead bulb to the keel, and what of cost. How did the 100kg affect speed and stability? Are you pleased with the result.
 
"Was there much involved in designing and fitting the lead bulb to the keel, and what of cost. How did the 100kg affect speed and stability? Are you pleased with the result."

I was fortunate that I had been in correspondence with another "Mischief 24" owner who had already had a bulb designed. He very kindly lent me the wooden plug he had made.
I took this to a local metal caster and had two half bulbs cast. The cost was c.£400 with me providing the scrap lead. The hardest part was drilling through the 2" cast iron keel. I out 2 cheap hand drills on the first hole.The second hole was drilled using a magnetic drill and proved much simpler. I then bolted the two bulbs to the keel set in an epoxy slurry. The result transformed the performance of the boat making it much stiffer and more able to punch through a chop.A couple of other boat owners from my club also added bulbs to their fin keelers using the same plug.
I eventually bought another Mischief 24 on Ebay and was going to make the same modification and had had the bulbs cast. However when I started to drill the keel the drill started to go through like a knife through putty. The keel on this one was lead not cast iron so as a result was some 50% heavier than the cast iron one.I didnt fit the bulb to this as I reckoned it didnt need the extra weight.
 
If it worries you...

Look, if the OP is really that worried, may I suggest the purchase of a type of boat that is designed to NEVER go over - any of the older 1960s full keel blue water boats. Something like a Nicholson 32 (or a Vancouver, or any of a host of others) has a long solid keel with a big heavy bit of lead in it. The vanishing angle of stability for a Nich 32 is 165 degrees...i.e., almost all the way upside down! If you can get one over, the beers are on me!
 
Whilst your fears of 360 degree knockdowns have been put to bed somewhat,as I recall
Folkboats seldom fit sets of reefing points, nor furling jibs. Reducing foresails on one therefore is not a normal activity for them. To prevent another possible crisis can I suggest you fit slab reefing, now rather than after the event. One row should suffice, leaving the jib as is.

ianat182
 
Another racing event, not a knockdown but we went over a lot further than we expected. This was in a 23' Extravert. We cocked up the spinnaker drop rounding the downwind mark and broached. The windex got knocked off the top of the mast when it hit the mark we were trying to round. The boat next to us reported that they were used to seeing the top of our keel, but it was the first time they had seen its bottom. No water shipped or other damage done. We popped back up and carried on. We never admitted that we hit the mark.
 
We never admitted that we hit the mark.

Tsk, Tsk....

I've had the masthead in the water when it all went very wrong with the kite up, width of the boat in question meant an angle of about 100 degrees I would guess. Exciting, but no real risk to the boat (well, except for the masthead windex, which was a little bent...)
 
The windex got knocked off the top of the mast when it hit the mark we were trying to round. We never admitted that we hit the mark.

Being out of control is no excuse you know. Although maybe you can try claiming you were trying to do a 360 penalty turn.
 
...as I recall Folkboats seldom fit sets of reefing points, nor furling jibs. Reducing foresails on one therefore is not a normal activity for them....

Depends on the Folkboat I think.

The 'proper' Nordic ones are rigged as big dinghies as you say, British and East German ones are more cruising oriented.
 
Old Troll

For those interested in Heavy Weather sailing. I see from their website that Westbound Adventures are running specialised courses out of Ardrossan in the Clyde during November. Again I have no commercial interest but know that they are experienced and knowledgeable.
 
Broaching is usually a consequence of carelessness or carrying excessive sail for the conditions. Be cautious when sailing downwind in strong conditions, especially if the seas are confused. It doesn't always feel like you need to reef when running as your speed can knock an actual F6 down to an apparent F5 for example.[/QUOTE

You mean like this?
SilkII_pitchpole.jpg


And yes she did come back, they all survived, although they reckon a crewman in the bows was 14ft under water....

A definite case of being over powered downwind.
 
Broaching is usually a consequence of carelessness or carrying excessive sail for the conditions. Be cautious when sailing downwind in strong conditions, especially if the seas are confused. It doesn't always feel like you need to reef when running as your speed can knock an actual F6 down to an apparent F5 for example.[/QUOTE

You mean like this?
SilkII_pitchpole.jpg


And yes she did come back, they all survived, although they reckon a crewman in the bows was 14ft under water....

A definite case of being over powered downwind.

The IOR boats did have a tendency to submarine. If there was a crewman on the bows (14' under or not) that is probably the explanation. Getting all the crew weight as far aft as possible helps, even in modern boats where it reduces the tendency to broach. No reason why a competent race crew couldn't carry that much sail in those conditions.
 
The IOR boats did have a tendency to submarine. If there was a crewman on the bows (14' under or not) that is probably the explanation. Getting all the crew weight as far aft as possible helps, even in modern boats where it reduces the tendency to broach. No reason why a competent race crew couldn't carry that much sail in those conditions.

That was not an IOR boat, it's a BH41.
That was an extremely competent race crew (Admirals cup I think...?)
That was a 50kt gust (Cowes 1996 IIRC)

The issue they had was that the forehatch had been open whilst they were going upwind, and they had about a ton of water in the forecabin. The skipper said afterwards that he was suprised it has happened, as he would have expected the kite to have burst first.
 
That was not an IOR boat, it's a BH41.
That was an extremely competent race crew (Admirals cup I think...?)
That was a 50kt gust (Cowes 1996 IIRC)

The issue they had was that the forehatch had been open whilst they were going upwind, and they had about a ton of water in the forecabin. The skipper said afterwards that he was suprised it has happened, as he would have expected the kite to have burst first.

OK, I stand corrected.

However, I still stand by the bit (without the extra factors that made the boat bow heavy) a competent crew (like this one) could carry a kite in those conditions.
 
OK, I stand corrected.

However, I still stand by the bit (without the extra factors that made the boat bow heavy) a competent crew (like this one) could carry a kite in those conditions.

Racing at this sort of level means pushing boats to the absolute limits and then pushing a little more. Thats what racing is about. We all know how quickly things can go massively pearshaped on the water, and this is just another example IMHO, which thankfully lead to nothing more than an urgent change of underwear for all concerned!
 
Over this concern?

I wonder if you were thinking of the delivery of another folksong when it was knocked down (in a thread about damaged Hasler gear- been through every mention of these boats tonight) and got concerned... although it seems upon writing this you'd not got your's(?).

Will say I was in a knockdown in the Solent on an Impala during a race. Seem to recall it sitting there for a bit before righting, guess as main was let out. No fear of sinking and some giggling involved (OK, not from the owner), though that could've been adrenaline.
 
Top