JumbleDuck
Well-Known Member
Isn't that an exaggerated response, JD? Antifouling seems to be a significant, predictable headache for most folk - judging by forum input. And the boat-bag doesn't seem complicated - quite the reverse.
You need a frame to hold it. You need some sort of gate to let you in and out. You need to arrange a supply of whatever is in it to deter critters, even if that's just fresh water. You need to protect it from damage.
These things get invented regularly, though not as much as devices to recover MoBs, I grant you, and every single one sinks without trace after making the "new kit for the gullible" pages of the magazines.
Is it really "a couple of hundred quid", to have a 30ft sloop hauled out, and the old a/f removed by means in keeping with environmental laws, and the new paint applied?
About that, yes.
Do most owners go far enough, for long enough in the average season, to need antifouling that poisons the hull's vicinity continuously?
No, but the ones who care about fouling do. I think "poisoning the hull's vicinity" is a little emotive. We've left TBT behind, thank goodness, soit'smore gentle discouragement than active poisoning.
Cost could account for slow uptake, I agree - I haven't seen any indication of the cost - did you?
Sorry, can't remember. Antifouling costs me about fifty quid a year if I do it, seventy five more if the yard does in. At the very least a bag would cost me the two grand I save by not having a marina berth.