Iain C
Active member
Deliberately on a separate thread so as not to detract from the main RDR thread.
Does anyone else think that the top end RDR boats just need to be a bit tougher? I think we can forgive Charal...it's a very new boat and a steering issue can probably be put down to teething issues. But I just find it very disappointing that so many of the top end boats are seemingly not fit for purpose...the Ultime class seems to be a bit of a joke with major platform bits snapping off all over the place, and now Sam Davies' IMOCA is starting to delaminate. As have so many boats beforehand.
I get that this is supposed to be top end racing, and although the conditions seem pretty full on, I would not say that they are totally crazy. Oh, and guess what, if you are going to head out that way from Biscay in November, it might get a bit spicy.
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the top end stuff, and this current generation of foiling IMOCA is simply staggering. I met Alex last year, and he explained that the thickest piece of carbon between the keel and the bowsprit was just 2.6mm. Well, no wonder Sam is delaminating if the boats are that thin.
I've heard Alex talking about selecting the lightest alarm clock, the lightest food, and seen the video where the Ultime skipper grimaces about the weight of the polycarbonate windows in the steering pod so he can see where he's going.
I have a Fireball, 22 years old now, but still competitive. It's built to minimum weight and has to carry correctors to be "legal", and there's also a maximum weight of correctors allowed to ensure that the weight and strength is in the structure of the hull and not the lead under the thwart. The boat could probably be made today to be at least 25kg lighter, but as part of the attraction of Fireball racing is that the boats can be thrashed way up into the 30 knot range with breakages being rare, the class has avoided that route. I also had an old Cherub...it was a boat that had been built to an old rule set from glass and kevlar, and had been substantially modified to bring it more in line with the newer rules carbon boats (bigger rig, wider racks, twin trapeze etc) and as a result was a shocking 18kg overweight...on a 50kg rule! But...we won a nationals with it and came 3rd at another, on the basis that it never broke and the windier it got the harder we drove it.
I just wonder if some of the RDR classes had more emphasis on seaworthyness and durability, it might just make a more interesting race. And if a slightly heavier stronger boat took another 2 days to get there so be it, I'd rather see more racing and more finishers.
Interestingly I see the positively ancient IMOCA FaceOcean AlcatrazIT (which I have sailed) is still chugging along...and even with lordy knows how many Vendees under her belt now, I bet she makes it. Admittedly with a fixed keel she's about 50% slower than the modern kit, but perhaps a compromise might be in order?
Thoughts?
Does anyone else think that the top end RDR boats just need to be a bit tougher? I think we can forgive Charal...it's a very new boat and a steering issue can probably be put down to teething issues. But I just find it very disappointing that so many of the top end boats are seemingly not fit for purpose...the Ultime class seems to be a bit of a joke with major platform bits snapping off all over the place, and now Sam Davies' IMOCA is starting to delaminate. As have so many boats beforehand.
I get that this is supposed to be top end racing, and although the conditions seem pretty full on, I would not say that they are totally crazy. Oh, and guess what, if you are going to head out that way from Biscay in November, it might get a bit spicy.
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the top end stuff, and this current generation of foiling IMOCA is simply staggering. I met Alex last year, and he explained that the thickest piece of carbon between the keel and the bowsprit was just 2.6mm. Well, no wonder Sam is delaminating if the boats are that thin.
I've heard Alex talking about selecting the lightest alarm clock, the lightest food, and seen the video where the Ultime skipper grimaces about the weight of the polycarbonate windows in the steering pod so he can see where he's going.
I have a Fireball, 22 years old now, but still competitive. It's built to minimum weight and has to carry correctors to be "legal", and there's also a maximum weight of correctors allowed to ensure that the weight and strength is in the structure of the hull and not the lead under the thwart. The boat could probably be made today to be at least 25kg lighter, but as part of the attraction of Fireball racing is that the boats can be thrashed way up into the 30 knot range with breakages being rare, the class has avoided that route. I also had an old Cherub...it was a boat that had been built to an old rule set from glass and kevlar, and had been substantially modified to bring it more in line with the newer rules carbon boats (bigger rig, wider racks, twin trapeze etc) and as a result was a shocking 18kg overweight...on a 50kg rule! But...we won a nationals with it and came 3rd at another, on the basis that it never broke and the windier it got the harder we drove it.
I just wonder if some of the RDR classes had more emphasis on seaworthyness and durability, it might just make a more interesting race. And if a slightly heavier stronger boat took another 2 days to get there so be it, I'd rather see more racing and more finishers.
Interestingly I see the positively ancient IMOCA FaceOcean AlcatrazIT (which I have sailed) is still chugging along...and even with lordy knows how many Vendees under her belt now, I bet she makes it. Admittedly with a fixed keel she's about 50% slower than the modern kit, but perhaps a compromise might be in order?
Thoughts?