kashurst
Well-Known Member
I am experiencing a strange problem on my Targa 43 with 63Ps (yes I know I bought the wrong one but I like it anyway). The temperature down in the med is 32 degrees my boat has a dark blue hull and the alleged 2 X 370HP engines. I suspect my props are too big/overpitched a bit. I'll explain.
in the spring and autumn boat gets on the plane no problem, now its scalding hot she is a bit hesitant. I had the bottom cleaned off, props and shaft cleaned and antifouled (you need it around these parts) and cleaned out the intercoolers etc and I think the engines are running great (same, temps pressures, exhaust levels etc). Flat out on a calm day she does 32 kns. WOT speed is 2700 on port, 2800 on starboard. I generally cruise at @ 22kns, which is @ 2100 rpm. If the sea gets very rough (F5 wind against tide stuff) the port engine starts to give off grey smoke as though it is overloading. If I reduce throttle a bit smoke goes away again. starboard engine is fine regardless.
Also I have noticed that the boat hits the "hump" at 11.5kns (gps) and exactly 1500rpm. Now it is really hot the engines struggle up to 1700rpm when she takes off like a stabbed rat. When the weather is a lot cooler the engines barely hesitate at all. I have looked at volvo's data sheet for the 63Ps and the power and torque are both much greater at 1650rpm than at 1500rpm.
Bearing in mind that the boat is 13 years old, and have 800 hours on them, I think if my props were a tad smaller or the pitch reduced by @ 10% then the boat would hit the "hump still at 11.5kns but at 1700rpm and jump onto the plane with no hesitation regardless of the weather. I would loose a bit of top speed but I rarely go ever 25kns anyway so I dont mind. I would rather have her respond more positively and not have to work as hard. I don't know if my props are the originals but I am beginning to suspect not as an old MBY boat report states that the 370HP targa 43 came with 3 bladed props but mine are 4 bladed, and they gave a top speed of 30Kns, where I get 32-33.
Finally port engine uses @ 15% more fuel than starboard - is this normal or is there another potential issue? Other wise it behaves exactly the same as port engine.
any one know a good prop company I could talk to, or point out my no doubt glaring error somewhere. Thanks
in the spring and autumn boat gets on the plane no problem, now its scalding hot she is a bit hesitant. I had the bottom cleaned off, props and shaft cleaned and antifouled (you need it around these parts) and cleaned out the intercoolers etc and I think the engines are running great (same, temps pressures, exhaust levels etc). Flat out on a calm day she does 32 kns. WOT speed is 2700 on port, 2800 on starboard. I generally cruise at @ 22kns, which is @ 2100 rpm. If the sea gets very rough (F5 wind against tide stuff) the port engine starts to give off grey smoke as though it is overloading. If I reduce throttle a bit smoke goes away again. starboard engine is fine regardless.
Also I have noticed that the boat hits the "hump" at 11.5kns (gps) and exactly 1500rpm. Now it is really hot the engines struggle up to 1700rpm when she takes off like a stabbed rat. When the weather is a lot cooler the engines barely hesitate at all. I have looked at volvo's data sheet for the 63Ps and the power and torque are both much greater at 1650rpm than at 1500rpm.
Bearing in mind that the boat is 13 years old, and have 800 hours on them, I think if my props were a tad smaller or the pitch reduced by @ 10% then the boat would hit the "hump still at 11.5kns but at 1700rpm and jump onto the plane with no hesitation regardless of the weather. I would loose a bit of top speed but I rarely go ever 25kns anyway so I dont mind. I would rather have her respond more positively and not have to work as hard. I don't know if my props are the originals but I am beginning to suspect not as an old MBY boat report states that the 370HP targa 43 came with 3 bladed props but mine are 4 bladed, and they gave a top speed of 30Kns, where I get 32-33.
Finally port engine uses @ 15% more fuel than starboard - is this normal or is there another potential issue? Other wise it behaves exactly the same as port engine.
any one know a good prop company I could talk to, or point out my no doubt glaring error somewhere. Thanks