volvopaul
Well-Known Member
Perhaps you would like to comment on this post Tamarind? He has just delivered an 85 from Malta to Portugal.
For the love of God ... Seriously ??
It's paid for advertising. There are no data rules it's in keeping with the readership and hits the demographic.... Unsurprisingly the only one who seems to get it on here is an "ultra " car salesman !
I have just turned 42 and its a constant worry that I am nearing the age where I moan as much as some of you lot !
I don't get the data protection bit. IPC haven't given your data to anyone, the mag is supplied to them, and they parcel it with your MBY. The mag is offered as a freebie. If you don't want it, pop it in the bin with the wrapper. No harm done to anyone. As Henry said earlier, the adverts will have paid for the mag.
Ans1- Holy cow. Tell me you don't wear tin foil or a colander on your head to stop people stealing your thoughts.
2- No one has sold your data or given your email address away. HQ![]()
For the love of God ... Seriously ??
It's paid for advertising. There are no data rules it's in keeping with the readership and hits the demographic.... Unsurprisingly the only one who seems to get it on here is an "ultra " car salesman !
I have just turned 42 and its a constant worry that I am nearing the age where I moan as much as some of you lot !
I'm not at all bothered or offended by receipt of the Princess magazine and BCU send it to me anyway, but I just wanted to lob in a comment on the marketing skill/success angle, and this applies equally to the Ventura magazine that Ferretti et all send me and to the sunseeker = gods claim. I wish them all well but there is imho a significant element of their target audience that is thoroughly turned off by all of this lifestyle magazine marketing. It takes the brand backwards in the eyes of some potential customers imho. Sunseeker is perhaps the extreme example in that their entire marketing strategy is wholly unappealing to a significant chunk of people who have the money and interest to buy boats of the type they make (even though sunseeker boats per se are very fine machines).
It's hard to define exactly what the "turn off" feature is. I think it is rooted in the whole brash "look at me" sort of lifestyle that gets plastered around on our media generally and that these magazines seem a bit aligned with, and I think it finds its way into this media when the writing/journalism is done by people who aspire to the product and don't actually own it (it is always going to be the case that someone who can afford a big yacht isn't going to be a staff writer for a magazine, but the creators of this stuff slightly forget that perhaps). There is a sort of insensitivity to folks who are happy to be well off financially but do so somewhat more quietly.
Don't worry it won't be a Sunseeker mag ... They don't live in Pall Mall.... Eze beach as you say far from special but a rather pleasant find restaurant wise. Cheers
Weird view on what marketing is all about, imho.By marketing gods I meant in terms of blanket coverage rather than translation into sales
I totally agree with your comments. By marketing gods I meant in terms of blanket coverage rather than translation into sales or from an identification with the brand perspective. I also don't see myself as a Sunseeker sort of person.
One of the things I thought Princess did well with the magazine was aligning it to their brand. The West Country theme, the inclusion of smaller artisan producers rather than just the worldwide stalwarts, finding slightly eclectic, dare I say mad people such as the plane chap, even the world land speed record attempt using 3 old engines from the ministry of defence with a couple of hours left on them. The watchmaker had £1,000,000 commissions but said you don't need to waste money on a tourbillon movement and was enthusiastic about the quality of an off the shelf Rolex costing a fraction of his own product.
When you actually read the content it wasn't the usual product written by aspirational writers. If you merely took one look then threw it in the bin you wouldn't know.
Henry![]()
How is 'eclectic' and 'mad ' aligned to the brand? As for 'artisan', I think you need a trip to Oundle to see that!
I'm not at all bothered or offended by receipt of the Princess magazine and BCU send it to me anyway, but I just wanted to lob in a comment on the marketing skill/success angle, and this applies equally to the Ventura magazine that Ferretti et all send me and to the sunseeker = gods claim. I wish them all well but there is imho a significant element of their target audience that is thoroughly turned off by all of this lifestyle magazine marketing. It takes the brand backwards in the eyes of some potential customers imho. Sunseeker is perhaps the extreme example in that their entire marketing strategy is wholly unappealing to a significant chunk of people who have the money and interest to buy boats of the type they make (even though sunseeker boats per se are very fine machines). .
It's hard to define exactly what the "turn off" feature is. I think it is rooted in the whole brash "look at me" sort of lifestyle that gets plastered around on our media generally and that these magazines seem a bit aligned with, and I think it finds its way into this media when the writing/journalism is done by people who aspire to the product and don't actually own it (it is always going to be the case that someone who can afford a big yacht isn't going to be a staff writer for a magazine, but the creators of this stuff slightly forget that perhaps). There is a sort of insensitivity to folks who are happy to be well off financially but do so somewhat more quietly.
No worries though and there are bigger problems on our planet to deal with, and as I say I don't mind at all Princess sending out this magazine (I might if I were a shareholder desperate to stem my losses). It and the Ventura/Ferretti one always go in my recycling tub without ever being taken out of the envelope. Sunseeker also do an identical magazine btw - I'm not on their mailing list but it is always inside the Brit Airways Gold lounge at LHR T5
I think you have summed up exactly what turned me off it, and I was a bit disappointed that it was just another me-too lifestyle magazine.
However as you say I don't mind Princess sending this stuff out I would just like to read something different.
Based on coverage alone, we might say that ISIS is way better than S/skr at marketing... :ambivalence: