Keef
New member
Hi guys and gals,
I was talking about this with a friend and colleague earlier. I guess figuring out all the numbers-logistics would take a long time (must be a PHD in there for someone), but given the UK's huge tides we could surely generate most of our energy needs with just tide?
Obviously the downside would be the huge amount of energy expended on such a massive project, inconvenience to sailors and shipping and other costs I haven't even thought about.
On the whole it would make sense though. Massive investment in self sufficiency, skills, infrastructure. It certainly beats dirty coal and expensive nuclear power.
Numbers? Thoughts? Given that Bristol channel has one of the highest tidal ranges in the world the potential for turning that into clean energy must be tremendous.
Cheers, Keef
I was talking about this with a friend and colleague earlier. I guess figuring out all the numbers-logistics would take a long time (must be a PHD in there for someone), but given the UK's huge tides we could surely generate most of our energy needs with just tide?
Obviously the downside would be the huge amount of energy expended on such a massive project, inconvenience to sailors and shipping and other costs I haven't even thought about.
On the whole it would make sense though. Massive investment in self sufficiency, skills, infrastructure. It certainly beats dirty coal and expensive nuclear power.
Numbers? Thoughts? Given that Bristol channel has one of the highest tidal ranges in the world the potential for turning that into clean energy must be tremendous.
Cheers, Keef
Last edited: