wonkywinch
Well-Known Member
I think they've been and come back (maybe a few times) since this thread is over 4 years old. I've jumped in just to clarify that your post contradicts itself. If you set the autohelm for a waypoint you'll keep on a track over the ground rather than go with the tide as you suggest.Just crack on south, autohelm set bang on the west entrance. Leave on the turn of the tide first six hours tide will pull you one way, next six hours it will push you the other way. Balances itself out usually, but in the last few hours when in sight on the entrance you might need to make a little adjustment. Easiest passage there is, pay attention at the shipping lanes but chill for the rest.
Despite the curvy line in my crossing last year, there are less sea miles if you set a course to steer (heading) in the autopilot rather than a GOTO waypoint. In my case, worked up a CTS of 010 degrees from Alderney to the Fairway buoy and stuck that in the autohelm and just trimmed sails as we went along.
Even with a couple of hours to go to Fairway, the projected straight track line on the plotter screen was planted straight over St Cats and the IOW, it's only when the ebb really kicked in did the magic happen. See my scribbled workings, there is a 2.3kt then 4kt westerly flow only right at the end, the track history shows it grabbing us and pushing back across towards Fairway.
If I'd punched in a GOTO waypoint, the COG would have matched the line on the chart and we would have travelled a few more sea miles to achieve this, thus less efficient.
Since the general course had some east in it, I chose the passage time to make best use of all the flood since it would carry us generally in the right direction.


Last edited:
