Needed: old film with bad special effects

Refueler

Well-known member
Joined
13 Sep 2008
Messages
20,998
Location
Far away from hooray henrys
Visit site
The film was made in 1980 and the wreckage wasn't located until 1985 and it wasn't until then that it was apparent she had broken in two.


"Titanic was long thought to have sunk in one piece and, over the years, many schemes were put forward for raising the wreck. None came to fruition.[252] The fundamental problem was the sheer difficulty of finding and reaching a wreck that lies over 12,000 feet (3,700 m) below the surface, in a location where the water pressure is over 6,500 pounds per square inch (450 bar).[253] A number of expeditions were mounted to find Titanic but it was not until 1 September 1985 that a Franco-American expedition led by Jean-Louis Michel and Robert Ballard succeeded. "

In the museum on Poole seafront .... as you go up the stairs and look at the wall ... you realise its a depiction of the sheer depth and scale of Titanics final resting place. It shows her breaking up as she goes down ... and the scale size against the walls height.
 

Lucky Duck

Well-known member
Joined
9 Jun 2009
Messages
8,376
Visit site
In the museum on Poole seafront .... as you go up the stairs and look at the wall ... you realise its a depiction of the sheer depth and scale of Titanics final resting place. It shows her breaking up as she goes down ... and the scale size against the walls height.

Reading the plot of the book it was based on I don't think technical accuracy was at the top of the author's priorities

Raise the Titanic! - Wikipedia!
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
Anyone interested in the model they used see the website below.
Thanks. Although not as good as the African Queen going down rapids (I really want forward movement), "Raise the Titanic" looks like a definite possibility, and I have started an enquiry into the rights for that. Further suggestions are still welcome.
 

Sharky34

Well-known member
Joined
17 Mar 2020
Messages
5,111
Location
Southcoast
Visit site
I need, for work, an old film which makes unconvincing use of a model boat afloat. I wanted the rapids scene from The African Queen but even two minutes of that turns out to be extortionately expensive so I need to find something cheaper. Any bright ideas? The Maggie has a bad model, but only aground.
The US moon landings, plenty of strange shadows in that.
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,617
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
Amazing video ... must have a look at the whole movie ...

Not being a nitpicker - but interesting that they have a 'one piece' Titanic rise up ... considering that she broke up as she sank ...
That wasn't known until Bob Ballard found her - the assumption at the time of her sinking was that she went down in one piece; I think that's even one of the findings of the official enquiry
 

rogerthebodger

Well-known member
Joined
3 Nov 2001
Messages
13,756
Visit site
That wasn't known until Bob Ballard found her - the assumption at the time of her sinking was that she went down in one piece; I think that's even one of the findings of the official enquiry
My understanding is that she did not split apart on the surface but on the way down and reached the bottom in 2 pieces spilling out alot of the contents on the way down hence the large debris field around the stern etion
 

AntarcticPilot

Well-known member
Joined
4 May 2007
Messages
10,617
Location
Cambridge, UK
www.cooperandyau.co.uk
My understanding is that she did not split apart on the surface but on the way down and reached the bottom in 2 pieces spilling out alot of the contents on the way down hence the large debris field around the stern etion
According to Ballard, she broke apart at the surface,when the bending stress from the stern lifting out of the water became too great. But it happened when most of the fore part of the ship was submerged, so it wasn't apparent to witnesses, who had other things on their minds anyway. But the witness accounts tally with that, one some of the officers thought she'd broken.
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
I cannot remember where I read or heard it from ... but I always assumed the stern section starting to split BEFORE going under .. as many ships do when bow sinks first.
Google found me this. Dunno it it's right, though.

titanicBreakupReconstruction.jpg
 

Martin&Rene

Active member
Joined
25 Sep 2014
Messages
240
Visit site
Keep it amusing. Look at the videos of the model naval battle in Peasholm Park at Scarborough.

Unless you are doing something really official, you can use Videograbber to get bits of video from Youtube etc.
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
Keep it amusing. Look at the videos of the model naval battle in Peasholm Park at Scarborough.

Unless you are doing something really official, you can use Videograbber to get bits of video from Youtube etc.
Unfortunately, it's really official. We can point at stuff on YouTube whether or not it's legit (how would we know?) but anything we want to rely on we have to host, and we can't do that unofficially.
 

Refueler

Well-known member
Joined
13 Sep 2008
Messages
20,998
Location
Far away from hooray henrys
Visit site
One of the aspects of Titanic is that she was a riveted ship - welding of ships was in its infancy. Even if any welding was done in those days and for many years after in fact ... the sheerstrake and other parts still had rivets to try and reduce chasing cracks should they start.

But it had a tendency that in severe stress such as longitudinal with such a large long narrowish hull - the plates could move sheering rivets or creating weak joints etc.

I'm no Naval Arch of course - just remembering stuff from GSK (General Ship Knowledge lectures at Marine College - which included Ship Construction and relief of stress etc).
 

JumbleDuck

Well-known member
Joined
8 Aug 2013
Messages
24,167
Location
SW Scotland
Visit site
One of the aspects of Titanic is that she was a riveted ship - welding of ships was in its infancy. Even if any welding was done in those days and for many years after in fact ... the sheerstrake and other parts still had rivets to try and reduce chasing cracks should they start.

But it had a tendency that in severe stress such as longitudinal with such a large long narrowish hull - the plates could move sheering rivets or creating weak joints etc.

I'm no Naval Arch of course - just remembering stuff from GSK (General Ship Knowledge lectures at Marine College - which included Ship Construction and relief of stress etc).
I'm not a naval architect either, but my understanding is that in riveted joints it's friction between the plates which holds everything together, and the rivers are there mainly to provide the compressive forces which give rise to the friction. One the plates start moving relative to each other there isn't nearly enough shear strength in the rivets and you are, sooner or later, doomed.
 
Top