markc
Well-Known Member
Congratulations, enjoy the boat!
He talked me through the thrusters - each one is 20HP and incredible response when used alone, but when both are run the power output halves. However this gives a lot of confidence as does the remote you can plug in and control not just the thrusters but both engines too - this is not something you can take with you off ship, but comes with a long cable meaning you could moor her from say the sundeck stern and not be at the helm.
[/Q
I could only see 1 thruster and the advert only states one hydraulic 20hp bowthruster. ? I didn't see the crane either so must be an old advert?
Edited to add this.
I went back and looked again at the boat and description. I can see chocks on the swim platform and this quote....."Almar Reku LS40 Hydraulic Passerelle (400 kg Lifting). Teak replaced in 2015." Maybe you got confused with the "new crane" with this bit? It would lift a Williams 285 (DW 315kg) but not onto the rear canopy.
It's probably this boat http://www.boatwizardwebsolutions.c...nits=Feet&access=Public&listing_id=32184&url=, not the one that was linked to earlier.
Interesting to see the OPs reply to these observations that the boat seems not the match the spec .....
As an aside unless something is wrong with he hydraulics there is no reason other than at low idle for the thrusters not to generate full power or there abouts when used together. The 65 had them and cat had a low idle high idle switch. At hi idle they were fine.
Electronic throttle: It is not Kobelt controls - they were removed and replaced with a new system from ZF which has a host of control boxes under the floor but DO connect to physically gear box and engine throttle cables, so should the electric system fail you can (albeit in a crude fashion) get control of your engines physically
Can someone please explain the benefit of electronic controls to me? They seem to me to be an expense from which only the manufacturer benefits, but with no benefits for the user. In fact, since manufacturers know they fail they kindly install the ability to revert to manual control in case (for when?) they fail.
Explanations, please?
Electronic controls require much less physical effort to shift gears and adjust throttles. Think "Airbus" vs "BAC 111".
Yes but it should be designed to work at idle as people don't tend to use their thrusters at hi speed. ( our Cat s had a fast idle switch for the purpose that added about 200rpm )Is it not that the engine(s) which drive the PTO needs to be able to develop the HP required to drive both thrusters? If it doesn't, the rpm needs to be increased to where the PTO can deliver the correct HP.
Yes but it should be designed to work at idle as people don't tend to use their thrusters at hi speed. ( our Cat s had a fast idle switch for the purpose that added about 200rpm )
I don’t find it a problem synchronisation in fact In a way a challenge .
I like to be able to reach full rpm in N at the dock too .The other day changed the coolant ,so it was nice to circulate the new stuff and bring the engines up to temp at the dock .
With my VP , electronic throttle rpm was limited 1500 max in N ( from approx 3700 ish ? )You can disable the synchronization on my boat just by pressing a button.
Eeeek. That's can't have done it much good? And of course, with EDC there's nothing to prevent you doing the same.
You can disable the synchronization on my boat just by pressing a button.
Eeeek. That's can't have done it much good? And of course, with EDC there's nothing to prevent you doing the same.
When I enquired about hydraulic thrusters for Play d'eau I was told 'no' because the engines did not deliver enough HP at idle.