ianwright
New member
The people of the world are divided into two types. Management, or those who do it to people, and the managed, or those who have it done to them.
A family lived in a house rented for thirty years from the same company that owned their’ marina’ berth.
Management, who wanted the house for an employee of the company upped the rent for the house by 400%. After a few weeks of futile letter writing the tenant and his wife admitted defeat and moved out,,,,,,,, onto their boat. Management told them to vacate their berth, “No more liveaboards”. So they sailed. Somewhat sour.
The owner of an elderly wooden boat had the company lift out his boat for routine work. The boat was damaged during the lift. The owner asked the company to repair his boat under their insurance. The company refused and said that the owners insurance should pay. This time the owner had the resources to take the case to court, and he won. The Company paid for the repair. The next week they told the owner to remove his boat from company premises. He was not a ‘liveaboard’, but he was a trouble maker so he had to go.
That sounds like petty revenge to me.
It is long past time that boat owners, tenants of moorings that is, had the same level of protection in law from bad landlords, and good landlords from bad tenants as do house holders and landlords..
IanW
<hr width=100% size=1>Vertue 203, Patience
A family lived in a house rented for thirty years from the same company that owned their’ marina’ berth.
Management, who wanted the house for an employee of the company upped the rent for the house by 400%. After a few weeks of futile letter writing the tenant and his wife admitted defeat and moved out,,,,,,,, onto their boat. Management told them to vacate their berth, “No more liveaboards”. So they sailed. Somewhat sour.
The owner of an elderly wooden boat had the company lift out his boat for routine work. The boat was damaged during the lift. The owner asked the company to repair his boat under their insurance. The company refused and said that the owners insurance should pay. This time the owner had the resources to take the case to court, and he won. The Company paid for the repair. The next week they told the owner to remove his boat from company premises. He was not a ‘liveaboard’, but he was a trouble maker so he had to go.
That sounds like petty revenge to me.
It is long past time that boat owners, tenants of moorings that is, had the same level of protection in law from bad landlords, and good landlords from bad tenants as do house holders and landlords..
IanW
<hr width=100% size=1>Vertue 203, Patience