Lockdown sailing

Assuming all evidence is absolutely truthful and accurate then.

You have a sample size of 50 on a case by case (anecdotal / case study evidence) the NHS has a sample size of 10000+ the WHO have a sample size of over 500,000 and standardized cases that can be generalized. With trained statisticians behind them.

Also there has been no misquoting from myself without directly targeting it to yourself. This is how understanding works. I say something just off axis, you clarify and correct. Apologies if you thought I was being malicious this certainly isn't intentional.
Perhaps I misinterpreted your earlier post. :D
 
There are always gong to be local variations in data and experiences compared to those conducted on a national, or even international level so I think there is weight to several of the arguments on here.

My wife is a local GP and she was discussing the current situation on the phone with a colleague yesterday who is based in another town only 50 miles away. Both towns have similar demographics but if you had been listening to them (I was) you would think they were on different planets as far as the impact Covid-19 has had on their patients. Where one is speaking to patients every day who are displaying symptoms the other has hardly had a single incidence. I believe it is the case that some towns are experiencing far higher rates of infection than others so this does rather help to highlight the importance of not travelling unnecessarily.
 
Assuming all evidence is absolutely truthful and accurate then.

You have a sample size of 50 on a case by case (anecdotal / case study evidence) the NHS has a sample size of 10000+ the WHO have a sample size of over 500,000 and standardized cases that can be generalized. With trained statisticians behind them.

Also there has been no misquoting from myself without directly targeting it to yourself. This is how understanding works. I say something just off axis, you clarify and correct. Apologies if you thought I was being malicious this certainly isn't intentional.
ok , no prob :) , nothing anecdotal ,, 50 persons ( aprox , there is actually more , but without checking everyone individually and counting them ) , out of that number all have been either self isolating or sent home ( from medical based work ) on medical grounds because of " symptoms " , less than 10 were allotted , or permitted , tests . all tested were pos , nothing anecdotal about it . , unless of course you want to be insulting and call them all liars which does not do your credability much good.
 
That's the beauty of the scientific method. I don't have to 'believe' anything, whether its from a relative, bloke down the pub or bloke on the internet, but instead let the best evidence build up to a coherent consensus.
which scientific method is that , there are many and change daily ,, seems you might be happier listening to your drinking buddies
 
The rules about funding pnemococcal immunisation may have changed recently.
As the person who raised the matter, I just wanted to say that there seems to have been a push to get the older population fully covered in Germany, or at least in Baden-Württemberg, where my gang hang out. It seems to be covid-19 related, but perhaps indirectly.
 
Well there some good news,
parts of Europe have started to lift some restrictions and if it keeps dropping here in Italy more restrictions could be lifted on the next review dated on the 3rd May .
Hope here is if they lift the restrictions on travel within the country we be able to sail again within Italy ,
that will please and take a lot of stress from cruisers as many will have to start paying mid season rates in May for our size any thing from €550 to € 800 PM depending which marina and where you are in Italy .
Maybe the UK will follow although I think your a few weeks behind most of Europe .
Of course this will only happen if it doesn't all flare up again .
 
As the person who raised the matter, I just wanted to say that there seems to have been a push to get the older population fully covered in Germany, or at least in Baden-Württemberg, where my gang hang out. It seems to be covid-19 related, but perhaps indirectly.
It certainly makes sense to reduce hospital admissions as much as possible. Whether it is worth risking contracting COVID-19 by going into a GP surgery to get immunised against Strep Pneumoniae is debatable! I'm due a routine review with my Cardiologist and I'm very happy that it has been cancelled - or postponed. The letter did say that if the condition I am attending the clinic for is deteriorating I could phone and asked to be seen.
 
hah. Lots of that going around but we're all sailors here. No that's not an excuse to throw a fender at me!
I think we are relatively safe in Scuttlebutt. Here's a snippet from a post I've just seen in the MoBo forum!:eek:
Do you know how to remove the old cushions? Are they screwed from the backside?
 
ok , no prob :) , nothing anecdotal ,, 50 persons ( aprox , there is actually more , but without checking everyone individually and counting them ) , out of that number all have been either self isolating or sent home ( from medical based work ) on medical grounds because of " symptoms " , less than 10 were allotted , or permitted , tests . all tested were pos , nothing anecdotal about it . , unless of course you want to be insulting and call them all liars which does not do your credability much good.

Anecdotal evidence definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary
adjective
Anecdotal evidence is based on individual accounts, rather than on reliable research or statistics, and so may not be valid.

Just so we're clear on what I mean by anecdotal. This does not mean anyone is a liar, it means proper research and statistical methodologies have not been carried out.

which scientific method is that , there are many and change daily ,, seems you might be happier listening to your drinking buddies

The scientific method is defined as thus:
scientific method | Definition, Steps, & Application

but in short:
Definition of scientific method | Dictionary.com
a method of research in which a problem is identified, relevant data are gathered, a hypothesis is formulated from these data, and the hypothesis is empirically tested.

In essence... if I ask you what's your statistical significance and you have no clue what I'm talking about you can probably be safe in assuming that your evidence cannot be generalized.
 
Whether it is worth risking contracting COVID-19 by going into a GP surgery to get immunised against Strep Pneumoniae is debatable!

A week after he had had the jag, my uncle's GP surgery rang up to say that they were terribly sorry but the doctor had tested positive for COVID-19 and would my uncle mind staying indoors for two weeks ...
 
A week after he had had the jag, my uncle's GP surgery rang up to say that they were terribly sorry but the doctor had tested positive for COVID-19 and would my uncle mind staying indoors for two weeks ...
And it is suggestive that I got it about a week after an out-patient appointment at our local hospital. But, coincidence doesn't imply causation!
 
I said the, not a, scientific method. If that term is alien to you, you really have no place discussing this topic.
i am just wondering if you have any experience at all of it , you seem to be more content arguing pedantics , which you might not be if you had actually been involved in any way and had any real knowledge .
 
Some of us have more experience than others. Unfortunately contracting, dying from or someone else close to dying from does not make someone an expert in epidemiology or somehow make them a better source of evidence than proper rigorous research. Hopefully it would sharpen someone's caution, inspire to learn perhaps but using that individual's personal viewpoint of anecdotal evidence as something to apply to everyone is not just risky it's flat out dangerous.
 
Top