st599
Well-Known Member
Now that the MCA have got.off the fence and defined what is required for lithium batteries in coded vessels, we might see some guidance appearing.
It amazes me how incompetent the journalists are that write these articles. The fundamental requirement when discussing lithium batteries is to seperate the 5 commonly used lithium chemistries into their specific batterytypes. Then when you mention fires occurring with lithium, identify which chemistry caused the fire. Lumping all lithium chemistries together is stupid. Lifepo4 is the chemistry used in batteries installed on boats for domestic energy storage. It's very hard to cause thermal runaway, unlike some of the other lithium chemistries. It's not associated with the fires that have been occurring frequently on superyachts. These are the voltile chemistries used in e- bikes, e-foils and other superyacht toys.I kicked off this thread in the hope/expectation that it would draw out - beyond the usual wild-assertions-without-substance - lots of informative observations and knowledge.
Today I'm aware that Yachting World has published an article which should add a little more to the discussion:
YW's take on Lithium onboard
I'd like to have a Lithium batteries installation. I really would. But.... I'm not in the market for buying-in a potentially lethal problem I could not overcome on my own, at sea.
Unfortunately they don't make any distinctions between the different chemistries.Now that the MCA have got.off the fence and defined what is required for lithium batteries in coded vessels, we might see some guidance appearing.
Unfortunately that's exactly what the new MCA small vessels documents do - for coded vessels you need to follow their guidance irrespective of chemistry. For non-coded vessels, the document states that it is a recommended practice, so I'd assume we'll start to see insurers asking for recommended practice to be followed.It amazes me how incompetent the journalists are that write these articles. The fundamental requirement when discussing lithium batteries is to seperate the 5 commonly used lithium chemistries into their specific batterytypes. Then when you mention fires occurring with lithium, identify which chemistry caused the fire. Lumping all lithium chemistries together is stupid.
MCA said:“Lithium-ion battery” means a rechargeable battery containing lithium in any chemical form
Try asking an AI botIs there a thread somewhere with a precis of the new MCA recommendations? I can’t be bothered to read the whole thing to extract the battery bits
And then wonder whether what it told you is accurate. Twice the fun.Try asking an AI bot
Is there a thread somewhere with a precis of the new MCA recommendations? I can’t be bothered to read the whole thing to extract the battery bits
There’s an index. I did look at the battery section, but I have to say, that was 5 mins of my life wasted I’ll never get back.Thats just the document again. I didn’t want to read the whole thing
Hence my asking if someone had made a precis.There’s an index. I did look at the battery section, but I have to say, that was 5 mins of my life wasted I’ll never get back.
Hence my saying you don’t need to read it all, just the section on batteries, perhaps. But there’s absolutely nothing relevant there.Hence my asking if someone had made a precis.
In theory, but no. The engine start, construction, bilge pumps, radio, nav lights, fire, and various other sections might very well contain relevant info too so someone will need to read the whole document and extract any and all information relevant to lithium installs.Hence my saying you don’t need to read it all, just the section on batteries, perhaps. But there’s absolutely nothing relevant there.
I doubt that, unless it’s a very large bilge pumpIn theory, but no. The engine start, construction, bilge pumps, radio, nav lights, fire, and various other sections might very well contain relevant info too so someone will need to read the whole document and extract any and all information relevant to lithium installs.
Hard to say what crazy stuff they dreamt up. I can imagine a certain type (several on this forum) insisting that the BMS could shit the battery down at any time so lead must be used for bilge pumps and VHF. Unfortunately those are exactly the kind of people that enjoy being on committeesI doubt that, unless it’s a very large bilge pump![]()
I’d ordinarily suggest a little edit, but actually it’s brilliant.Hard to say what crazy stuff they dreamt up. I can imagine a certain type (several on this forum) insisting that the BMS could shit the battery down at any time so lead must be used for bilge pumps and VHF. Unfortunately those are exactly the kind of people that enjoy being on committees