PaulRainbow
Well-Known Member
I'm aware of that, hence the "experimental". I wanted to see for myself what would happen, rather than the doom and gloom claims from some internet sites. It doesn't do what they say. I've been using it for year now with no adverse effects. The only negative thing i've found is that with the alternators connected to the LA batteries i don't get much charging, because the LA are already charged. If i removed the alternator charging and fitted a DC-DC charger between the engine batteries and the LFP bank that fixes the charging issue. At the moment they provide dark ship syndrome and give me an alternate way of starting the engines, however, i'll be removing them soon and fitting DC-DC chargers for charging. I'll be fitting two additional key switches in the main electrical panel to operate two contactors, one will parallel the load circuits and the other will bypass the BMS. For emergency starting, turn both keys on, start the engines, turn them both back off. In the event of a dark ship, isolate the LFP bank (from a key switch in the main panel (already fitted)) and turn the parallel key on.It might be interesting if insurance companies start requesting compliance with ISO or ABYC. This set up of mixed chemistries won't comply with either standard.