Talulah
Well-known member
Well the Jury is out. Literally. They've been considering their verdict most of the day.
Presumably a verdict tomorrow.
Presumably a verdict tomorrow.
And of course, immediately electronically zap the jury to wipe their memories of what was just said.
The Prosecution know that once mentioned, the mud will stick, regardless of what the Judge says. That is precisely why they break the rules. They can't do it too often or they will be charged with contempt I suspect, or have some other professional sanction applied. But they will do it just enough to swing a jury when it makes the diferrence between winning & losing a case.
I am a criminal barrister
Searush, I am a criminal barrister and i can say without a shadow of a doubt that you have no idea whatsoever what you are talking about.
Fine, I would appreciate the benefit of your experience then - unless you only speak when paid?
.. you cannot expect his Clerk to let him spend too much time on replying- it will mean said Clerk will not be able to change his 70' Princess and 2 month old Spyder when the ashtrays are full, meanwhile the Brief gets on the bus to his next case- in Torquay
"The Prosecution know that once mentioned, the mud will stick, regardless of what the Judge says. That is precisely why they break the rules."
And it is precisely why the judge is able to stop the trial, discharge the jury and start all over again with a new jury.
Which in turn is why barristers don't resort to such tactics.
As for the sea-going or not barrister - its worth remembering they can capably defend murderers, rapists, burglars etc etc without experience of any f these pastimes, I doubt they would have difficulty with a sailing trip gone wrong.
BTB
I'm still not clear what prescisely it is they are charged with.
Well it's hard to say if I agree or not without knowing exactly what the charges were, but on the face of it I think a 'not guilty' is good news.
Just for clarity, except one of the charges - 'But they failed to reach a verdict on a charge of whether he failed to properly assess the risk of the voyage '
Well it's hard to say if I agree or not without knowing exactly what the charges were, but on the face of it I think a 'not guilty' is good news. So I won't be popping the cork on a bottle of Moet tonight but I'll probably have a swift pint of Directors to the health of CS and JM.
No doubt the hanging judges on YBW will now accuse the entire British Justice System of trolling!!!
No doubt the hanging judges on YBW will now accuse the entire British Justice System of trolling!!!
...
It would have changed the face of yachting for ever if they now had criminal convictions to their names. The trial has done enormous damage to the trust between sailors and the rescue services. It may make some sailors think twice before calling the Coastguard or RNLI for help. Very sad and the last thing we wanted to happen.
I'm not so sure that it is unmitigated good news -snip- the fact that convictions have failed under existing law may lead to more rigorous legislation being called for.
I am so pleased.
It would have changed the face of yachting for ever if they now had criminal convictions to their names. The trial has done enormous damage to the trust between sailors and the rescue services. It may make some sailors think twice before calling the Coastguard or RNLI for help. Very sad and the last thing we wanted to happen.