qsiv
New member
Re: XP reliable!!!
Maybe - but I can only tell it like it is.
None of our clients would dream of running an unsupported OS (they would fail due diligence checks), so that rules out NT3,4, W3.11,95.98 and I believe ME.
I accept that none of our machines is more than 4 years old, and as such we may have been better placed than some to upgrade - but if we hadnt I'd have simply bought new machines, as the cost of unscheduled stoppages of the old OSes is far higher than the cost of replacement.
For portables with adequately new BIOSes there is really no contest - XP is just so much better.
Maybe - but I can only tell it like it is.
None of our clients would dream of running an unsupported OS (they would fail due diligence checks), so that rules out NT3,4, W3.11,95.98 and I believe ME.
I accept that none of our machines is more than 4 years old, and as such we may have been better placed than some to upgrade - but if we hadnt I'd have simply bought new machines, as the cost of unscheduled stoppages of the old OSes is far higher than the cost of replacement.
For portables with adequately new BIOSes there is really no contest - XP is just so much better.